May 2003

The Purdue benchmark research has been conducted since 1995. Purdue currently holds data for more than 5,400 call centers. To learn about how to participate in some of Purdue University’s new benchmark research, please visit www.BenchmarkPortal.com.

Q: What is the best practice regarding which calls to monitor and score?

A: The most common practice is to randomly select calls to be monitored and scored. In my opinion, the best practice is to select those calls that have one or more parameters that are substantially different from the average. For instance, monitor those calls where the talk time is two times the average talk time, or those calls with extensive hold time. The importance is to monitor those calls that have the highest likelihood of having something worth coaching.

Survey questions asked pertaining to the above graph:

1. In your most recent experience in calling for customer service assistance, how did the telephone agent do in satisfying your needs and handling your call? 

2. Was your issue (reason for the call) resolved on the initial contact?

In this figure, we see a relationship between “meeting customer expectations” and the number of calls required before the issue is resolved. As you can see, if it took several calls to resolve the issue, the caller was not happy with the experience. 
As shown above, respondents who perceived that their problem was resolved on the first call also perceived that the company exceeded their expectations. As the number of calls increases, so does customers’ dissatisfaction. Some of these correlations may appear obvious, but keep in mind that scientific research allows us to prove these relationships statistically.

Survey questions asked pertaining to right-hand graph:

1. In your most recent experience in calling for customer service assistance, how did the telephone agent do in satisfying your needs and handling your call? 

2. Based on this positive experience, will you use this company in preference over their competitors in the future?

In this figure, we see an interesting correlation between “exceeding expectations” and the percentage of participants who would use the company again in the future. As you can see, a greater percentage of respondents whose expectations were “exceeded” said they would use the company again versus those whose expectations were only “met.” 
This figure shows that the customer must receive “wow!” service to help ensure his/her loyalty and intention to repurchase.

Keep in mind this graph also shows that 16 percent of the people whose expectations were “met” would not use the company again in the future — this is a crucial finding for call center managers striving for quality.

Dr. Jon Anton (also known as “Dr. Jon”) is the Director of Benchmark Research at Purdue University Center for Customer-Driven Quality. Have a question? E-mail him at DrJonAnton@BenchmarkPortal.com.

3rd Annual VoIP Developer Conference
August 8-10, 2006 - Westin Santa Clara Santa, Clara, CA • http://www.voipdeveloper.com

TMC's Customized Keymail Alert and RSS Service Usage Instructions  To receive daily e-mail alerts and RSS URLs of stories posted on TMCnet.com, please enter keyword terms to match and your e-mail address.   Keyword 1: Keyword 2: Keyword 3:   E-mail Address: Search terms are case-insensitive. Enclose in double-quotes for exact phrase match. No password necessary!

• Data Love
• EDITORIAL: The morning after: Regardless of who won, the body politic probably has a headache
• P.A. Semi PWRficient Processor Wins Disk Array Design at NEC System Storage Products Division
• ExxonMobil Agrees to Disclose Soft Money Political Contributions
• Altera: Gartner Names Nios II Processor as FPGA Industry's Number One Soft Processor Core
• India May Crack Blackberry Encryption
• Real-world politics enter World of Warcraft
• Hackers Deface U.N. Web Site, Leave Political Message
• Comsys Rolls out ComMAX Mobile WiMAX Baseband Processor
• UCF gets $4.5 million grant to aid laser research, industry