The application service provider business model has
taken a beating over the last year, fueled by media
claims that so-called hosted services would go the way
of the failed dotcoms of yesteryear. Fortunately, just
as many substantial, well-run dotcoms have seen success
despite the economic slowdown, many hard-working ASPs
have also come into their own. Their acceptance in the
marketplace has little to do with media projections of
failure, and a lot to do with the enterprise market's
slow acceptance of the viability of the hosted services
model.
It's no surprise that business managers have been
skeptical of the benefits of outsourced services. After
all, they have dedicated personnel and processes in
place that have been operating on par for many years --
why rock the boat? But the same managers have realized
that many operational processes are becoming streamlined
in our continuously converging world, and a task that
once required three full-time, specially trained workers
and three expensive software licenses to operate and
maintain can be hosted remotely for a less expensive
monthly fee, and maybe one part-time administrator with
basic knowledge of Web interfaces.
The prospect of personnel cutbacks brings up another
interesting factor, and one that has also slowed
enterprise adoption of these types of services. Where do
hosted services leave the highly trained personnel who
once carried out a specific task? It's a prospect that
has caused many an IT Manager and MIS employee to
scrutinize the ASP business model, emphasizing weak
areas and de-emphasizing its inherent cost savings and
efficiency. But let's face it: We're in the midst of an
economic slowdown, and Fortune 500 companies are
slashing jobs and laying off tenured staff members left
and right. Where does that leave the remaining employees
-- say, the highly trained IT staffers? It leaves them
with two to three times as many responsibilities as they
once had. And that prospect is making the ASP model look
more promising than ever, to both technology workers and
their managers, who are continuously watching the bottom
line.
TAKING CARE OF BUSINESSES
The sheer number and variety of business functions that
may be handled on a hosted basis is astounding.
Communication systems are an obvious target based on
this magazine's coverage, and immediately represent a
cost-savings and personnel reprieve for small to
mid-sized businesses. After all, why spend money trying
to add functionality and scalability to an aging PBX
when you can get your voice and data services through
one access point, in a flexible and easily configured
platform? Hosted communications solutions offer this
type of functionality, from IP Centrex services to
cutting-edge features like voice-activated dialing and
directories to sophisticated unified communications
systems for employee and customer messaging. But hosted
communications systems are also beginning to represent
an attractive alternative for large enterprises --
particularly those solutions that offer the flexibility
of integrating with existing PBXs and LANs/WANs, while
offering better functionality and easier administration
and management.
The realm of hosted communications extends well
beyond supplying converged telephony and data services,
and this is an area where large enterprises are really
beginning to see benefits. I've already mentioned
unified communications, and audio and video conferencing
can also be added to the list. Video conferencing has
historically had a lukewarm reception in the enterprise
realm, and expensive conferencing servers and slow
connection speeds haven't helped its acceptance. But
today's hosted multimedia conferencing platforms push
those problems to the core, leaving the service provider
to worry about quality of service, packet loss, and
scheduling. In fact, many of today's hosted conferencing
solutions offer on-demand scheduling, so businesses can
simply plug in their logistics and enter a conference.
And added features like collaborative Web browsing,
whiteboarding, and application sharing make conferencing
a great tool for the enterprise.
Mobility is also emerging as a critical tool for the
enterprise, and hosted communications services can help
push enterprise applications to wireless devices. Access
to e-mails and voice mails are only the basic benefits
mobility brings -- and the ability to sync with database
applications and CRM platforms is showing just how
valuable mobile devices are becoming in conducting
everyday business. Not only do intelligent wireless
services allow road warrior employees to check back with
home base, but they allow businesses to support a
permanent team of remote employees who are continuously
in sync with enterprise-side operations, an ideal
prospect for contact-center workers and outbound
calling.
And beyond mobility, hosted communications offer
tremendous benefits to the growing contact center. Today's
platforms can replace the functionality of existing ACD,
IVR, and knowledge management software very easily.
However, they're also flexible enough to integrate with
existing solutions, offering contact center managers a
great path toward scalability and convergence with data
and Web applications. For customer service, hosted
applications offer perhaps one of the best solutions
around, essentially because they enable so much self
service, easing the burden on customer service
representatives (CSRs) while offering assurance to
customers that things will be done correctly -- since
they're doing much of the work themselves. But even as a
customer service contact mechanism, the hosted
communications platform offers a number of options, from
unified message routing to CSRs, to call buttons on Web
sites that enable instant voice and text messaging over
IP, giving customers the satisfaction of immediate
service.
A QUESTION OF SERVICE
The list of hosted services that can aid everyday
business operations goes on and on, from remote
help-desk applications (see our review
of DesktopStreaming for more information) to
billing, ERP, and OSS services. The value to
enterprises, both large and small, is exceedingly clear.
But what about the drawbacks -- those problem areas IT
personnel have been so quick to point out in
discouraging adoption of the ASP model? The industry is
certainly still experiencing growing pains, but in the
short time we've been covering it, we've noticed massive
changes in the way service contracts and quality issues
have been handled.
First off, the service level agreement (SLA) has
matured immensely. Long gone are the days when service
providers drafted innocuous, vaguely worded contracts
promising a basic service, but not clearly defining the
parameters for delivering that service. Today's SLA
contains guarantees for service and service delivery
alike, and clearly defines what acceptable levels of
downtime or lapses in quality (depending on the type of
service) might be. It also contains provisions for both
customer and service provider if the conditions are not
met, and goes even further in defining the service
provider's relationship with other service providers,
who may be delivering one or more components of the
service. All providers must meet their guarantees to
ensure a quality experience for the customer, and the
customer's customers.
Service providers are also better protected now,
thanks to developments in security and privacy
technology. And some are even carrying insurance,
through a program recently introduced by the ASP
Industry Consortium as well as other private
programs. (For more information on these programs, read
Laura Guevin's Hosted Exchange
column.) Communications are one component of the hosted
services marketplace, just as many vertical markets have
emerged for these types of services, including the
financial, retail, education, healthcare, and government
markets. But hosted communications hold a great deal of
promise for the enterprise, and education of their
benefits and versatility is critical. After all,
businesses are asking how they can cut costs and
maximize their resources in an economic downturn. And
ASPs offer a flexible and convenient way to do just
that. The wakeup call has been made -- now it's up to
the enterprise market to begin a wide-scale
implementation of these cost-saving, resourceful
services -- or risk losing more highly trained and
valuable employees to the chopping block.
[ Return
To The September/October 2001 Table Of Contents ]
|
Score One For
The Enterprise
Microsoft. The name conjures up mixed emotions in a
competitive and pressured technology industry. But whatever
your opinion may be of the company and their business
practices, you have to admit that Microsoft
made business computing what it is today. Not to say someone
else couldn't have done it just as well, if not better --
but Microsoft did it first, serving up an easily navigable
user interface with Windows, intuitive business applications
with Office, and most recently (and most highly debated),
Web access with Internet Explorer. The company intends to
expand its operating system into a full-force communications
tool with the release of Windows XP this fall, and is
entering the hosted services realm with its .NET initiative.
It seems completely logical to me that the company that
made enterprise, client-side computing what it is today
would take the next big step and offer a platform for
hosted, server-side applications, and even a hosted
operating system. The .NET strategy will make the Windows OS
and applications available over the Internet to PCs as well
as handheld devices. It will enable users to access all
their communications and information, regardless of what
device they are using to connect to the Net. Extensible
Markup Language (XML) is at the core of the strategy, and is
also playing an important role in hosted voice applications.
See our interview with Microsoft's
Charley Pitcher for more information on how .NET will be
used to deliver hosted communications.
Microsoft's success with the .NET platform will be
largely determined by acceptance of hosted services in
general -- and vice versa. My Outlook this month discusses
some of the perceived drawbacks of the ASP model, and what
service providers have done to assuage enterprise concerns
over these drawbacks. I think Microsoft has the potential to
play a key role in overall acceptance of the ASP model.
After all, a majority of enterprises rely on Windows and its
slew of business applications for most of their computing.
If Microsoft begins to offer this technology on a hosted
basis, won't they be likely to take notice?
Widespread acceptance will hinge on a number of
provisions, not the least being the cost model Microsoft
decides to use for .NET. XP pricing has already caused quite
a stir in the industry, so I would guess Microsoft should
tread lightly if they want to win existing customers over to
.NET. The enterprise, of course, is the ultimate winner in
the hosted computing strategy, just as the introduction of
Windows and the applications that came with it changed the
face of enterprise communications and operations. If
Microsoft can get the .NET strategy off the ground in a
timely and efficient manner, it has the potential to once
again change the face of enterprise computing.
[ Return
To The September/October 2001 Table Of Contents ]
|