|
Power Protection For Continuous
Availability Of Telecom Systems
BY ROBERT BAUER
Communications networks are being utilized in systems and processes that
have become increasingly critical. Continuous systems availability is no
longer an option, but a necessity. With an average cost estimated at $4.8
million per hour of downtime, even minor disruptions to data and voice
networks can be devastating. When you consider the proliferation and
expansion of these networks, which extend into areas such as application
hosting, e-commerce, and online trading, you may realize that the
convergence of these networks has compounded the problem of developing and
maintaining continuous communications systems.
One of the challenges in preventing downtime is being able to develop a
power protection strategy, which includes provisions for site monitoring,
maintenance, and emergency services for continuous availability of
mission-critical systems.
The Changing Face Of Power Protection
Two factors have combined to change the power protection needs of
telecommunications applications forever. First, the critical nature of the
applications has increased to where availability in the
"five-nines" is not merely a goal, but an expectation. Secondly,
the convergence of information technology and telecommunications networks
has created a whole new "communications" environment, and
therefore a new set of challenges. Instead of supporting telephony services
across a geographic area, that same local telephone network may now provide,
among other value-added services, access to the Internet. Similarly,
telephone services can now be provided through cable. The birth of
colocation facilities is an example of the growing need for five-nines
available converged service.
Power Protection In A Mixed Equipment Environment
Telecommunications facilities managers are faced with the dilemma of how to
power a variety of equipment, often a hybrid mix of information technology
and telecommunications networks, as reliably and economically as possible.
This requires devising power protection plans that encompass both AC and
DC-powered equipment.
Traditional telephony applications, from central office exchanges to
switching and PBX networks, have standardized around a -48VDC source. There
are many reasons for this. First, its negative polarity reduces corrosion
problems with underground cables and conduits. Historically, the low voltage
made it easy to implement, as well. Systems using less than 72V generally
did not require licensed electricians, nor were they governed by the NEC. As
opposed to commercial AC, DC power is the "standard" for carrying
voice signal, and is also considered more reliable because it is more easily
stored than AC power.
Power Protection For Today's Challenges
Today's converged communications networks often require facilities managers
to accommodate equipment that requires an AC power source. The AC power is
often derived by way of inverters powered from the -48 VDC power system. An
alternative is the use of an AC UPS, which is often more straightforward,
efficient, and is lower in cost. In comparison to DC systems, an AC UPS uses
higher voltage batteries, provides regulated voltage output, is available in
higher power capacities, and allows for longer power distribution distances.
As availability demands continue to increase, power quality and
environmental factors become much more complex issues. It is important that
the AC UPS provide power as reliably as the associated DC power system. In
many systems, the DC-powered equipment is not fully operational without the
AC-powered equipment and vise versa. It is, therefore, important to take a
total systems approach.
Conventional telecommunications power systems employ inverters powered
from the -48VDC power plant to supply the AC-powered loads. To achieve high
levels of power reliability and availability, four or eight-hour battery
back-up times are typical. This approach is not always appropriate for
facilities where a significant amount of electronic loads require AC input
power. The conventional information technology facility relies on AC UPS
systems with 15 minutes of battery back-up time supplemented by permanently
sited standby generator systems. Clearly, a systems approach to the entire
facility power requirements is needed to provide the desired level of
reliability and availability at facilities having both AC- and DC-powered
equipment.
More Than A Single Device
To avoid compromising the availability of load equipment, the power system
needs to be about 10 times more reliable than the load equipment. Therefore,
redundancy in the power system is required. In order to facilitate
implementation of the power system redundancy, a number of critical
telecommunications and information technology equipment is available with
dual input power connections.
In its basic form, distributed redundancy involves creating two redundant
power protection system busses and redundant power distribution systems.
This eliminates as many single points of failure as possible, all the way up
to the load equipment's input terminals. In order to provide "fault
tolerance," some method of allowing the load equipment to receive power
from both power protection busses must be provided. To protect against fast
power system failures, such as circuit breaker trips or a power system
fault, either dual input load equipment, or very fast transfer switches need
to be applied between the two independent power sources in order to
eliminate any common failures. For today's large convergent
telecommunications facilities, that is, those with large, high-availability
information technology equipment, dual redundant UPS systems with redundant
AC power distribution must be deployed.
With large, convergent telecommunications facilities, an emerging power
system configuration is the use of small distributed, redundant DC rectifier
systems supplied from large, dual redundant AC UPS systems. Small,
self-contained DC rectifier systems along with AC Power Distribution Units (PDUs)
can be located throughout the information technology data center to supply
either AC- or DC-power to the load equipment. The "best practices"
of large information technology data centers are merged with the DC power
systems of telecom facilities to optimize reliability. Redundant, standby
generators can be used to provide dependable power in the event of a
sustained commercial AC power failure. This solution ensures that the air
conditioning system is powered as well since heat buildup within the room
can shut down the load in as little as five minutes.
A Look at Surge Suppression
Surge suppressors were originally designed to prevent what are potentially
the most destructive power disturbances: Sudden spikes that damage
microprocessor circuitry. Some of the more advanced surge suppression units
are robust enough to stand up to the devastating power of a lightning strike
and protect highly sensitive circuitry and hardware. The appropriate line of
TVSS (transient voltage surge suppression) can protect anything from a
single server to an entire building. The same technology that protects extra
sensitive equipment in a medical diagnostic imaging suite also makes an
ideal protection device for the high-speed routers in telephone lines such
as centralized PBX operations, modems, or KEY systems. This is because the
high-frequency noise filter of TVSS not only detects but also actually
"clamps down" on small surges, minimizing interference with normal
utility power. Instead of cutting off power disturbances, the unit
continuously limits distortion at every point of the sine wave, whether it's
a surge or spike. This unique filtration feature is one of the few methods
of limiting ringwaves, the associated aftershocks of a rapid reduction or
increase in the power load.
Communications Tools for Added Reliability and Control
Today, power protection extends beyond power quality to expand into the
monitoring and management of connected equipment. A UPS can play an active
part in this process, provided it is equipped with the appropriate
connectivity and communications capabilities. Shutdown abilities can range
anywhere from performing routine alerts of imminent power loss, to load
shedding, and staged shutdowns from a single location; or from turning off
non-essential applications from a facility-wide UPS, to saving precious
battery time for vital servers. The bottom-line need, of course, is to alert
users to the problem before the power aberration or equipment failure.
One method of doing this is through today's sophisticated UPS system of
alarm and on-screen messages. It is now possible to supply event-specific
information that provides instant recognition of a power problem. These
messages can even be sent directly to a specific area, so that a facility
manager or engineer can respond and resolve the problem before any real
business disruption occurs. Different types of UPS communications are also
available in redundant form, which allows for multiple solution paths in the
event of a problem. An example of this is the latest in-band/out-band
redundant communications technology. In this strategy, the UPS provides
out-of-band communications separate from the network wire, assuring
emergency contact with administrators or the equipment manufacturer even in
the event of network failure.
Supporting The Infrastructure Once It Is In Place
Specifying and maintaining a high level of availability absolutely requires
access to a number of support services. Preventative maintenance is critical
to long-term effectiveness of a power protection program. Contracting an
outside firm with power protection-specific experience is often the best way
to ensure optimum performance and reliability. Make sure your vendor
includes regular testing, checking the battery plant, verifying that the UPS
and rectifiers are operating properly, and thermographic surveying of
selected equipment and connections in order to prevent failures in the
electrical systems. Telecommunications sites, particularly if they are
unmanned or remote, need thorough periodic reviews. These reviews should be
included in an effective power protection program, in order to prevent
problems or recommend corrective actions.
Another consideration in choosing a service organization regards their
capabilities vis a vis emergency service. It is important to seek out
providers that offer factory-trained individuals with engineers available to
match service-call criteria. Service professionals should know the setup and
should ensure speedy delivery by carrying stock specific to your setup or
applications. This is important in providing service to mission-critical
equipment for larger and more complex systems where replacements may be
needed same day.
Robert Bauer is president of Liebert Americas, a subsidiary of
Emerson, headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. Liebert designs, manufactures and
distributes systems that control temperature and humidity, condition power
and guard against outages in data centers, telecommunications facilities and
Internet hosting facilities that all house sensitive electronic equipment.
Please visit their Web site at www.liebert.com.
Return
To The March 2001 Table Of Contents
|