February 1999
Internet Call Waiting:
A Killer App Whose Time Has Come
BY EVAN KOBLENTZ
The time has come to add Internet call waiting to the CTI and Internet telephony killer
apps list.
Most people know that modems don't work with call waiting, but some creative thinking
is providing the long-sought answer. Rather than developing unified messaging, cut-rate
long-distance, or PC-PBXs, several companies are providing call handling alternatives and
simultaneous voice/data connections for analog lines that are eternally busy.
True call waiting is still an impossibility because modems follow the "0" or
"1" programmer's mindset - they can be on or off, but never in flux. Most
dial-up users prevent losing their data connection by temporarily disabling call waiting
with a region-specific dialing prefix such as *70. However, until now, users who want to
accept the inbound call and gracefully shut down their data connection (or at least let
the caller know that they're home) have been out of options.
Some client-side solutions "solve" the call-waiting problem by preventing the
unexpected dropping of your data connection and providing for a handling mechanism.
Solutions come from companies like Computer Peripheral Systems, Fireball 7 and Command
Communications, all of which make small client-side boxes that sit between a telephone
line and multiple analog devices, like a telephone, modem, or fax machine.
When the modem or fax machine is in use, the devices intercept inbound calls and
activate an LED or an audio alarm. Now aware that someone is calling, the user can close
the Internet connection and answer the call or simply ignore the call without the fear of
being taken off-line. Placing a caller ID device earlier in the circuit allows for a
better determination of whether or not to take the call.
FOUR SOHO SOLUTIONS
The very first product we examined was the Caller ID-Call Waiting Switch from Computer Peripheral Systems. The ICWM is
the most complete device in its class, because it offers audio, visual, and screen-based
call alerts and data. Its caller ID features include distinctive rings and selective
aborting for any caller, plus a 200-caller database. The unit is about the size of a VHS
cassette, it weighs less than 2 pounds and it costs $169. CPS also has a Call Waiting
Switch, which uses only the LED alert, doesn't have a CTI link and is smaller, but that
model is more affordable at $79 or $99 with a flash-hook option.
Command Communications' HotCall
is similar to the basic CPS product mentioned above, but it uses just one LED instead of
four and is slightly larger. It costs $135, it has better documentation, and from what we
could gather by taking the units apart, HotCall seems to have a stronger case but less
stable interior components. Like the CPS offering, HotCall works well with its cousins
from the same manufacturer. Also included is a document that explains how to adjust your
modem's S10 initialization setting to allow for a greater call pick-up time.
Fireball 7 offers
WEBS, a $50 solution that accomplishes the same tasks as the CPS Call Waiting Switch and
HotCall. WEBS has an on/off switch, which is a nice feature, but it doesn't have a
dedicated RJ-11 port to attach a telephone - you need to use a wall jack with two ports or
put a Y-connector earlier in the circuit between the unit and the jack.
EASE OF INSTALLATION
One thing that these devices have in common is installation. Users attach four wires - one
from the wall jack, one from a modem or fax machine, one from a telephone, and one for an
A/C power adapter. That's it! There is no messing with settings and no software, except in
the case of the ICWM. Our advice for Internet call waiting device owners is to add the
extra measure of double-sided tape or adhesive Velcro when determining where to place the
unit. They all have rubber feet to prevent slipping, but with three or four attached wires
and the busy SOHO environment, they're likely to be abused.
An addition that we'd like to see for these devices is a ringer adjustment or
notification method control - users should be able to choose if they want the call
notification to be an LED or an audio alarm. We also think that HotCall's one-lamp
solution makes more sense than the four-lamp solution from CPS.
A similar software solution, albeit a hybrid client-server solution, comes from InfoInteractive. Users subscribe to
InfoInteractive's Internet Call Manager service. As part of the service, InfoInteractive
(which has partnered with many regional Bells) subscribes to your Baby Bell's busy-call
forwarding service on your behalf. Each time you go online, the busy-call forwarding is
activated and all inbound calls are routed to an ICM server, which sends the caller ID
data to you over IP in the form of a screen pop. Users can choose to ignore the call, send
the caller to voice mail (currently available only in Canada), or play an "I'll call
you back
" or "You call me back
" message to the caller. ICM
actually offers four levels of service, but the American versions (ICM Direct and ICM
Classic) are both $5 monthly and $25 for six months.
ANOTHER WAY
A different approach uses Internet telephony to eliminate any need for call waiting. Most
of these server-side solutions follow an identical process. Some examples include products
from the following vendors:
Using the busy-call forwarding service, software captures incoming calls - not just the
caller ID data - and the call is routed to a server. There, it is converted to IP form and
sent back to your computer through the existing data connection, allowing a phone-to-PC
(or in some cases, phone-to-phone) Internet telephony call, complete with screen pops and
desktop call control limited only by the developer's imagination. These products are
targeted for ISPs and other telephony providers, who in turn resell call waiting as an
enhanced service.
But there are still several drawbacks to using simultaneous voice/data - the user
generally needs a powerful multimedia computer and a Java-enabled browser; very few ISPs
offer such services today; and most people's last-mile Internet connections are still
limited to 56K or less. The audio quality of the call is good because the circuit is
usually a relatively straight path between the service provider and the end user, but
without adequate bandwidth, the standard drawbacks of latency, jitter, echo and packet
loss may still apply.
CONCLUSION
With the range of solutions available today, there seems to be a better way to handle
inbound calls when your line is busy, whether you're a home user or the biggest of ISPs.
Caller ID has been prominent since the mid-1980s, and it's just now becoming user
friendly. With cable modems, DSL, wireless, and even fiber Internet connections becoming
more common, the opportunities to develop, resell, or use an analog call notification
device or an IP-based virtual second line may be limited. Meanwhile, whether your
responsibility is an enterprise, an ISP with hundreds of POPs, or a simple home telephone,
there is an appropriate modem call waiting solution for everyone.
Evan Koblentz is a technology editor with TMC Labs. Catch Evan's twice-monthly
column - CTI@Home - on TMCnet,
your online resource for CTI, Internet Telephony, and Call Center Solutions at www.tmcnet.com. Comments? Questions? Evan can be reached ekoblentz@tmcnet.com. |