Nobody said salvation was easy, not even with technology, which often creates as many
problems as it solves. For every technological advancement we implement, we seem to create
more distractions for users, and more complications for MIS personnel.
The promise of technology, however, is that it will work its magic while shielding
users from its complexities. As a matter of fact, technology is much more user-friendly
than it used to be. But technology hasnt been so good at sparing MIS. Indeed, MIS is
more harried than ever.
Once, not so long ago, MIS confined its interests to data communications. But now, MIS
is also taking responsibility for voice communications. Is it any wonder MIS feels
overwhelmed? We might even understand how MIS could doubt whether technology has the
potential to simplify life not just for users, but for implementers.
Fortunately, many of the current MIS woes are temporary. For example, MIS can look
forward to better integration of voice and data communications. Thats the good news.
Whats the bad news? Complexity wont disappear once the current problems are
resolved. It will pop up somewhere else, as new problems arise, and as new solutions are
devised, and as new problems arise, and so on, and so on
It would appear that technological salvation isnt a one-time thing. It is,
rather, a career-long commitment. So, if youre in MIS, you may never enjoy a lot of
relaxation, but you will have job security. (If that seems bleak, dont blame me. I
started thinking along these lines after speaking with Dialogics Erica A. Erickson,
who suggested this articles title.)
WELCOME TO THE VICIOUS CYCLE
Technology decisions for corporations used to be straightforward. Consider this
not-so-gut-wrenching question: Should we buy a typewriter with correctable ribbon, or
should we just order another case of whiteout? Well, nobody ever got fired for buying
liquid paper.
Today, technology decisions can instigate a chain of consequences. Each technology we
purchase requires another technology to either manage or fix the original technology. What
got us into this vicious cycle? The PC. It has changed, seemingly overnight, the
purchasing habits of corporate America.
Corporations that purchased the original IBM PC or XT were soon enticed to upgrade
their slow and limited PCs and XTs to state-of-the-art PC ATs. (I wont harp on the
upgrades from ATs to 386s, 486s, Pentiums, Pentium Pros, and Pentium IIs.)
Once corporations had a good number of PCs on all their users desks, they
realized that users needed to share files, as well as resources such as printers and
scanners. So, they ran out and installed a LAN with a network operating system, most
likely one from Novell.
Then corporations realized they needed a network administrator to keep the LAN up and
running. This person needed to be well versed in the Novell system of networking and
administration.
Once the network was up and running, corporations had another problem. The network
needed to access the legacy mini or mainframe. Now the LAN administrator worked with the
legacy computer group to connect the network to the legacy computer. That complicated life
somewhat, but a lot of dumb terminals got replaced by good terminal emulators.
PROLIFERATION OF MIS DUTIES
As corporations got caught up in upgrade cycles, they ended up investing a lot of money.
So, naturally, they wanted to make sure they got the most out of their investments. And to
whom did they assign responsibility for making sure the investments really did pay off?
MIS, which started accumulating a bewildering array of chores.
Instituting Corporate Web Access
The benefits of extending Web access to employees are impossible to ignore. The Web is a
powerful research and information gathering tool. With access to the Web, corporate users
can collect information from the company Web site as well as Web sites maintained by
vendors, customers, and competitors. Being online at least once a day seems mandatory.
Otherwise, its hard to see how you could keep up on news that affects your
company/industry.
Once you decide you need to give employees Web access, you soon discover that you need
the appropriate resources, typically a T1, a CSU/DSU, and a router. Granted, once they are
installed, a T1, CSU/DSU, and router may be relatively painless. However, they are
challenging to choose and configure.
Managing Corporate Web Use
While Web access is a powerful business tool, it does have its drawbacks. Only the most
focused person can resist browsing sites that, while fascinating, are irrelevant. Too
often, users are tempted to linger on sites that have little or nothing to do with getting
work done, which can undermine productivity. Thus, while Web access is mandatory, it seems
that monitoring how Web access is used (and abused) is mandatory as well.
As a matter of fact, we recently installed a Web usage and reporting program at TMC.
This type of program tracks external Web sites visited by Web users in our company. Of
course, adding this capability is an extra burden on our already busy MIS department.
Extending Web Access To Customers
Many companies give their customers access to legacy data. Such companies include airlines
that allow customers to review their frequent flyer accounts via the Web. If customers
lacked Web access, they would have to call on the services of call center agents and
managers. Thus, Web access can be liberating to call center personnel, who can turn their
attention to more challenging (and remunerative) tasks. On the other hand, customer Web
access represents another headache for MIS.
Worrying About Web Security
Servers on the Internet will always be vulnerable to prying eyes. We need to constantly
monitor our servers for hacker attacks. Firewalls and regular security checks are musts.
Implementing Fax
I may have been too quick to blame the PC for all of MISs woes. Theres fax,
too. Back when the PC was new, many of us decided that next day delivery service was too
costly and too slow. So, we bought fax machines. Then, we toyed with fax boards for
individuals and eventually fax servers for the masses. Again, more work for MIS.
Guarding Against Toll Fraud
A decade ago, many of us realized that while computers automate written communications,
voice mail does the same thing for verbal communications. So we ran out and bought voice
mail for all our users. Right around the same time, many of us needed interactive voice
response (IVR) systems to connect to our legacy computers. Using screen scraping or other
technologies, IVR systems allowed our customers to read their bank balances, 401K account
summaries, and other information while freeing up agents in our call centers.
We soon learned, to our horror, that IVR and voice mail systems are vulnerable to break
ins, and that our corporations could be liable for hundreds of thousands of dollars in
fraudulent long-distance calls. So now, many of us take courses on protecting our phone
systems from break ins. And many of us purchase software to recognize and prevent toll
fraud.
Of course, implementing additional security measures gives users with another place to
look for messages and more passwords to remember. And people in charge of telecom systems
must continually monitor phone usage to guard against the depredations of hackers.
Maintaining E-Mail Systems
E-mail access has spread like wildfire. Most people I know have two or three accounts
already, along with rules about which types of e-mail are appropriate for each account.
For example, personal messages usually go to a casual (usually Hotmail) account. Serious
messages usually go to a work address. And as for AOL accounts, well, theyre of
indeterminate status as far as I can tell.
I am supposed to remember when, where, and how to e-mail almost everyone I know. Who
has time? Who can keep track? One possible solution: Personal e-mail managers, a single
account invested with the intelligence to distribute e-mail messages to subaccounts
according to user-defined rules.
However people decide to manage their e-mail, theyll likely call on an MIS
specialist every time the e-mail doesnt work. A typical problem: A large attached
file (avi or exe) that chokes the network or server and more often than not
has nothing to do with work.
PERSISTENT CONCERNS
Backups
If you work without backups, you will pay the price, sooner or later. It happened to us.
One day, one of our PCs crashed, losing the most important document in the whole company.
To prevent any other such calamity, we instituted a backup policy, whereby designating
directories (such as "My Documents") on every computer in the office were backed
up on a regular basis. In addition, we established a system of backup rotation, on-site
and off-site, to ensure we never lost important data again. Of course, these measure
demanded more time and effort from MIS.
Viruses
Viruses threaten every node on the network. In our company, we set a policy: No one is to
bring an outside disk onto our network. This policy, like any other policy, is observed
only imperfectly, so we took the additional measure of buying anti-virus software and
installing it on every node of our network.
Unfortunately, anti-virus software soon becomes obsolete because old viruses mutate and
new viruses appear all the time. MIS needs to concern itself with making sure anti-virus
software is upgraded continually. Otherwise, the company risks losing important data.
Providing Adequate Bandwidth
When network traffic increases, as it always does, network speed suffers, and users start
to complain. Under these circumstances, we start paying attention to the computer press,
which entices us to upgrade our networks from 10Base-T to ATM, switched
10/100 Base-T, 100VG-AnyLAN, or Token Ring, depending on the year. A simple rearranging
of LAN segments may do the trick, but either way MIS takes on the bulk of the work.
The Year 2000 Problem
Just when it seemed we already had enough to worry about, we realized that the
talked-to-death (and easy to ignore) Year 2000 Problem demanded immediate attention. In
the year 2000, which is just 18 months way, many legacy programs wont work properly.
Moreover, many of these programs are written in languages such as COBOL that went out of
fashion years ago. Thus, fixing these programs is bound to cause ulcers among MIS
personnel.
EVALUATING COPING STRATEGIES
If you think the proliferation of technology problems will end, think again. It
wont. It will, in fact, get worse. Cant we just hire more MIS people?
Dont count on it. Were practically at full employment. Furthermore, nearly
200,000 technology positions in the United States remain vacant. Clearly, MIS people are
just going to get busier.
So, what do we do? Declare a moratorium on technology? Not likely. Instead, we have to
be on the lookout for technologies that promise to consolidate MIS duties, as well as
technologies that let users accomplish more on their own.
It is clear to me that any technology that simplifies the life of both MIS personnel
and users and also makes them both more productive will be a breakthrough success. I
describe a few candidates in the following:
Unified Messaging
With unified messaging, not only can the user avoid fussing with multiple inboxes and
delivery mechanisms, MIS can take advantage of a central administration system for voice
mail, e-mail, and fax. Without unified messaging, adding and changing a workers
information is a nightmare. You must update a fax server, voice mail system, PBX, and
e-mail server. Maintaining disparate systems demands too much attention. We need to unify
all our messaging.
PC-PBX
One of the nicest features of most every PC-based PBX is the Windows-based GUI interface
that provides an exponential leap in ease of use and power over the old character-based
interface that many legacy and new PBXs ship with. Web configuration of extensions allows
users of many of these PC-PBXs to set up follow-me information to allow every important
call to reach them, regardless of the users physical location. This definitely beats
calling in for voice mail every half-hour when you are waiting for an important call and
are out of the office.
Internet Telephony
Finally, there are converged voice, video, and data networks that rely on the IP protocol,
which is to say, Internet telephony. Many corporations are already planning the roll out
of converged voice/data networks in the next few years. Stringing a single cable to the
desktop with a single management and configuration point is a great time and cost saver.
This doesnt even take into account the efficiency and cost savings of Internet
telephony when calling beyond your corporate location.
CONCLUSION
Technology is getting more complicated and distractions are proliferating. CTI magazine
will continue to update you on products and technologies that not only make users more
productive but also allow MIS and Telecom departments to deploy new technologies that will
ultimately accomplish what technology always promises: More options, more power, and more
effective shielding of users and implementers from technologys underlying
complexities.
|