As the PSTN opens up to new applications and transport mechanisms, changing from the
proprietary, closed system of the past, the key idea is to open up the development
environment to take advantage of PC form factors and the richness, creativity, and
ingenuity of the PC development community to bring about new enhanced services that will
revolutionize the ways that we communicate. And while this represents perhaps one of the
biggest gold rushes of the coming century, it is important to bear in mind that gold
rushes have always broken more people than they have made. The point is not that we
shouldnt pursue the glimmer of the golden promise. For every 100 developers who
believe that they are creating the next killer app or enhanced service, its likely
that only one or two of them will see a measurable return on their investment.
And the thing is, the developers know this. Yet they still want to take a chance. The
potential returns are tremendous were talking billion dollar markets here,
many of which have remained amazingly untapped in the past 50 years or so. But developers
and investors are only likely to take so much risk. The promise of a 100-to-1 or
1,000-to-1 return is appealing, but only if the required investment is within reach
is an acceptable potential loss.
That is why, for all the excitement about IP-enabled networks and the cries for greater
bandwidth, no one is really suggesting that we rip out the old network and throw it away
to replace it all with new equipment (well, okay, maybe Cisco is suggesting this, but they
have a clear reason for being excessive here its called profit motive). No,
what most people are suggesting is that the old network be made as next-gen as
possible gradually shifting intelligence to the edge and dramatically increasing
the speed at the core, making more efficient use of existing transport media (copper,
cable, power lines) to overcome last mile issues, and so on.
The idea is to make the network as accessible as possible so that no one company or
development firm has to bear the burden of building out an entirely new infrastructure.
That would be a Herculean task. Instead, ILECs and RBOCs are opening their networks (or
being forced to open their networks this is not always a friendly move) to allow
the entry of prospectors who are willing to make the necessary investment in
their ideas, their particular genius who are willing to take the risk that the
incumbents havent been willing to take for many, many years.
UP TIME
But, this all has to be done without shutting down the phone system. As the name of
this section suggests, it must be up 24 x 7. Heres an example: while I have voice
mail on my home phone, and while I am willing to accept a twice yearly shutdown of the
voice mail system for upgrades between midnight and 4:00 a.m. on Sundays, I am
not willing to accept such a shutdown of the phone system as a whole. If the incumbents
are to have all of these alternative service providers offering enhanced services over
their networks indeed, if the incumbents are to become enhanced service providers
themselves they need systems that can be put in place quickly, brought up and
running smoothly and without adversely affecting existing service, and that can be relied
upon to provide PSTN-quality service all the time.
TIME-TO-MARKET
So how do PC-familiar developers who are willing to take the gamble, to bet their own and
their investors money on a dream and a service, get in the door? First, of course,
their platforms must be mission-critical, NEBS compliant, five-nines and all of that. But
there are going to be hundreds or thousands of developers out there with access to these
platforms and brainstorming on the same ideas. So time-to-market becomes crucial as well.
INCREASING THE PACE
And that is exactly what RadiSys is looking to do with their newly announced PACE (PAcket
Circuit Engine) application-ready industrial computer platform. RadiSys has designed the
PACE platform family to provide OEMs with a common single platform on which to develop
multiple applications for the telecom and datacom markets, and they are targeting the
enterprise, ISP, and central office markets. OEMs might be able to do this system
integration work themselves, but why should they? When they are in a race against time and
against their competitors to provide services that are not only always up and running but
are also in high demand, why should they waste precious time in designing underlying
systems and testing for compatibility between pieces of equipment?
The answer is that they shouldnt, and RadiSys has heard that answer loud and
clear. They are responding with their PACE initiative. The first member of the PACE family
to be generally available is the PACE 2000, an integrated subsystem that is ready for use
by OEMs of VoIP, SS7 signaling gateways, IVR, and mixed media applications. Included in
the PACE system are a CompactPCI chassis, an Intel-based host CPU, various Texas
Instruments DSP-powered single board voice gateways, and all the necessary software (OS,
RTOS, kernel, algorithms, and API) pre-installed by RadiSys instead of by the OEM or a
systems integrator.
Of course, this dramatically decreases time-to-market of the application and allows it
to be shipped more quickly than would normally be possible. But it also brings other
benefits. For example, RadiSys has designed and tested all of these components to work
together in just such a system, reducing the risk of incompatibility problems and system
quirks. So the application-ready platform not only decreases time-to-market it
increases the chance that when the product is released that it will be successfully
implemented and wont lead to unforeseen problems in the network. These platforms
have been rigorously tested as integrated systems by RadiSys, plus any testing that an
individual developer will do on his/her own applications.
So is RadiSys the only company doing this? Well, their approach is certainly unique,
but there are other players in this market who are equally concerned with providing
mission-critical development platforms that can be deployed quickly and that can be relied
upon to perform.
HERE COMES (THE) SUN
For example, Sun Microsystems has their ServiceProvider.com package designed for start-up
service providers who are new Sun customers and who are looking for a platform to support
their ISP, ASP, or Web hosting business. With this program, service providers are able to
acquire the necessary equipment at a significantly reduced price and gain access to key
ISVs as well. The FastTrack Starter Solution comes in three configurations, depending on
the requirements and business plan of the intended service provider:
- Entry Level Solution a cost-effective solution for a start-up that includes four
Netra t 1 rackmount servers, Solaris OS, and Solaris firewall software.
- ISP Starter Solution an entry-level platform for a start-up ISP targeting 5,000
to 10,000 accounts that includes two Netra t 1 rackmount servers, two Netra 1125 rackmount
servers, Solaris OS, and Solaris firewall software.
- ASP Starter Solution an entry-level platform for a start-up ASP that includes two
E450 servers, three E250 rackmount servers, So-laris OS, and Solaris firewall software.
Like anyone else looking to sell to the service provider market, Sun is concerned with
scalability and reliability, as well as time-to-market. And in this sense, one of
Suns strongpoints is their use of the Solaris operating system. Although Windows is
becoming increasingly popular among telecom developers and boasts a tremendous development
community in the more traditional IT world, the fact remains that a large percentage of
the existing service provider infrastructure whether you mean the PSTN or the
Internet runs on some flavor of UNIX, and Solaris is one of the more popular
flavors.
THE PACK IS BACK
Hewlett-Packard is also a big force in selling equipment and support to service providers,
and they have their HP OpenCall Solution Provider Program in place to help ISVs and
systems integrators looking to develop and deploy their applications in the public
network. This program includes help on the equipment level such as assistance in
designing, financing, and utilizing a system and technical support on everything from
HP-UX to Web and NT development.
However, HPs program goes beyond equipment and technical support to include
promotions and marketing assistance, trade show support, a single contact person for all
interactions with Hewlett-Packard, and other benefits. This kind of behind-the-scenes
support helps ensure that your development keeps moving forward and gets the exposure it
needs to be successful.
This combination of integrated products and extended support for developers is one of
the benefits that has resulted from convergence and the use of more open development
platforms. Ideas are out there, and suddenly it is very possible for developers with a
standard IT background to design enhanced services that can actually be deployed in the
public network. However, these people dont have the background in voice and voice
networking requirements that they might need to be considered serious players in this
space.
The equipment suppliers stand to sell a lot of hardware and software to these
developers, but first they need developers who have enough confidence in their ideas and
skills to put their money where their mouth is. Thus the rise of these kinds
of programs and initiatives among traditional equipment vendors.
These are just some of the initiatives I have heard about out there, and Im sure
there are many more that are worthy of consideration. This is a trend that we can expect
to see more and more of as partnering and open systems begins to change the old PSTN
proprietary model.
Chris Donner is associate editor for Communications Solutions magazine. He
can be reached for comment at lguevin@tmcnet.com.
|