In a perfect world, front-line leaders and
management can start the workday off by looking in a magic crystal ball
and predicting the weeks events, including employee absences. As this is not likely to ever be a true
source of helping to maintain crucial staffing levels for your call
center, leaders must know how to predict unplanned employee absences. Fortunately, the topic of predicting
absenteeism has been well researched.
While
the complexity of measuring the reasons for absenteeism is great, there
is, however, research and scholarly studies using least squares
analysis and extensive time-lapse evaluations providing a plethora of
knowledge on determining the root causes of employee absenteeism. It goes without saying that unplanned
absenteeism equates to work not getting done, or at least not efficiently. The per-employee cost for absenteeism in
2002 was over $800/year, which is up $34 over the previous year and up
$179 from 2000. In addition, direct and indirect
costs combined -- including costs for replacement workers such as lost
productivity -- can account for five to 17 percent of a companys total
payroll.
Along with research on the topic and personal
experience as a practicing Human Resources professional in a call center
work environment, the following are the top five predictors of
absenteeism. Use this information in your practice to determine more
effective work policies and procedures which will retain employees and
increase their devotion to your organization, leading to less loss of
productivity.
TOP FIVE PREDICTORS OF EMPLOYEE ABSENTEEISM:
-
Previous
years absences. Without a doubt, the most reliable measure of an
employee's future attendance record is their record from the past. If at all possible, include attendance inquiries as part of your
companys employment background checks to minimize hiring the more
absent-prone employees.
-
Job
Characteristics. Low amounts of skill variety, task identity and
autonomy significantly affect a persons likelihood to have
attendance issues. Ensure that
an employee has a mix of tasks and is challenged by the work and
interested. Ensure the employee
finds meaningfulness in their job and understands his importance and
impact on the business operations. Finally,
ensure the employee is aware of his responsibility for outcomes of the
work completed. Such
improvements will mean the difference between an employees ability
to attend work and the employees motivation to attend work.
-
Stress.
The level of stress and more specifically, the lack of work-stress
release mechanisms have a direct correlation to employee absenteeism. Research reflects significant
connections between actual physical health ailments brought on by
stress. Illnesses, depression,
traumatic work or life events can all increase stress and absences
from work. In addition, because
people are not always able to avoid work-related physical stress due
to the nature of the work required, they have to learn to address and
manage it. It can be argued
that ergonomic programs in the workplace can decrease absenteeism
costs.
-
Shift
Work. Commonly, people who work nights or off-hours tend to have more
absences as these hours result in more scheduling conflicts with
activities and responsibilities outside of the workplace. When possible, allow flexible
schedules for such employees but that still allow for the work to get
done.
-
Personalities.
While not always the most blatant factors of employee absenteeism, the
role of human personalities can not be ignored. Neglectful behaviors serve as
reliable offshoots of absenteeism. Employees
with low achievement orientations, aggression, instability and high
sociability are more likely to be absent frequently. This has been tagged as
absence-proneness in psychological references. Selection processes, which identify these characteristics, can
reduce absenteeism.
Concurrently, human resources personnel have the
potential for positively influencing the business when accurately able to
predict the factors influencing employee absenteeism by behaving
proactively. However, the ever-changing face of business requires HR to
re-evaluate the once-obvious distinction of absenteeism. Understanding why absenteeism is such a
prevalent problem in today's workforce is crucial to a company's ability
to minimize its detrimental impact; however, there is no single quick fix
to the problem. Fortunately,
knowing how to recognize the predictive nature of such behavior is clearly
a step in the right direction for any organization.
Darcey
Lakhdar, PHR, is a graduate of the University of Central Florida and
is currently pursuing her master's degree of Human Resources at Rollins
College in Orlando, FL as well. While certified as a Society for
Human Resources Management HR Professional (PHR), Darcey draws from her four
years of HR experience in manufacturing and call center work environments.
Darcey Lakhdar can be reached via e-mail at dm1205@msn.com.
Purchase
reprints of this article by calling (800) 290-5460 or buy them directly
online at www.reprintbuyer.com.
REFERENCES
Griffeth, R. W., & Hom, P.
W. (2001). Retaing valued employees.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Harrison, David A. & Martocchio, Joseph J.
(1998). Time for absenteeism: A 20-year review of origins, offshoots, and
outcomes. Journal of Management 24,
305-350.
Martocchio, Joseph J.; et al (2000, Autumn).
Connections between lower back pain, interventions, and absence from work:
A time-based meta-analysis. Personnel
Psychology 53, 595-624.
Parmelee, M. A. (2003, February). Absenteeism
survey points out need for changes in human resources programs. American water Works Association
Journal, 95(2), 47-49.
Rentsch, Joan R. & Steel, Robert P. (1998,
Spring). Testing the durability of job characteristics as predictors of
absenteeism over a six-year period. Personnel
Psychology 51, 165-190.
Watson Wyatt Canada (2000, September 20). Cost of employee absenteeism up, says
Watson Wyatt study. Retrieved November 21, 2003, http://www.benefitsworld.com/AA/Abmgt/absence-wyatt092000.asp
Respond
to this article in our forums! |