TMCnet
ITEXPO begins in:   New Coverage :  Asterisk  |  Fax Software  |  SIP Phones  |  Small Cells
 

Feature Article
November 2003


Wireless VoIP -- Future Changes

BY RICHARD WATSON

In previous articles, the challenges of security, reliability, VoIP protocol robustness, and voice quality have been discussed in relation to the implementation of VoIP on 802.11/WiFi wireless networks. Despite the technical complexities that may exist, it is possible to purchase wireless VoIP devices that provide excellent voice quality in today�s market. These offerings, often requiring vendor specific adjunct components, are being deployed in an increasing number in commercial and enterprise environments. But do the current wireless VoIP products meet all the requirements of the market? No.

As technology advances, so do the demands and requirements of those customers that want to integrate such technologies into their corporate infrastructures. As with most things in life -- there are many �changes� on the horizon for wireless VoIP products. In this article, we try to look into the future (as best as possible) and identify some key elements of the evolving and changing wireless VoIP landscape.

WIRELESS CHANGES
Today�s WLAN products are mostly 802.11b or WiFi. The 11Mbps data rate supported by this standard meets most of the data rate needs of today�s applications -- as did 10Mbps Ethernet. However, the demand for increased bandwidth is never-ending as customers see applications for wireless video and the like. These bandwidth hogs require higher total available bandwidth -- thus new high-bandwidth standards are emerging that are targeted to meet these demands.

How does this impact �voice� applications? To understand these dynamics, you have to learn your �A, B, G�s.� IEEE 802.11b (WiFi) supports raw data rates up to 11Mpbs, but the new �A� and �G� standards support 54Mbps (and higher). While Access Point proximity dictates the exact effective data transfer rate, these newer standards easily meet the demands of the new, bandwidth hungry mobile applications. So, what�s the difference between these standards and what are the major consideration regarding voice applications?

The major difference between the �A� and �G� standards is the operating spectrum frequency utilized. The �G� standard utilizes the 2.4GHz ISM band (like �B�) while �A� utilizes the 5.2GHz band. One rationale for using the 5.2GHz band is that the ISM band may become too crowded and introduces a possibility of interference problems (e.g., Bluetooth, RFID tags, cordless phones, microwave ovens and other 2.4GHz applications). Deployment of an �A-only� network will, of course, require deployment of 802.11a wireless voice devices which are, as of yet, not readily available on the market.

A �G� network may have the potential drawback of operating in the 2.4GHz band, but it can also provide the extended capability of supporting �B� devices. This feature is a real asset to those companies that have already deployed �B� WLAN infrastructures with �B� mobile devices. With a �G� WLAN, older �B� mobile units can continue to be used along with any new �G� mobile devices.

Since bandwidth is not a major issue with regards to supporting good wireless voice quality (this can be done well with just 1Mbps), the issue of deploying new wireless technology will be an issue of retaining existing investments in mobile devices or purchasing new devices. To date, however, there have only been a few vendors that have announced support of 802.11a or 802.11g for a wireless VoIP application; most are still 802.11b compliant. Even when these do become available, there is a potential of greater power management demands in both �A� and �G� devices that may impact the length of battery life.

So, how might �G� and �A� impact voice applications? The biggest issues would be (1) the availability of a specific RF conformant device (e.g., an �A-phone�); and (2) potentially shorter battery life which may reduce standby time or talk time.

RF SERVICE CHANGES
Unfortunately, the �standards� are still evolving, forcing future changes. The two major functional elements that will be impacted by the impending standards changes are:

� QoS � Quality of Service or voice prioritization.
� Security � authentication and encryption.

The 802.11e standard attempts to address the issue of QoS. Supplanting the current proprietary voice QoS offerings, this standard would provide a vendor independent QoS service�maybe. As currently drafted, the standard allows for some latitude in implementation options. A fully conformant WLAN product would potentially impose an AP capacity limit on access to the WLAN and lower the overall system call capacity. For this reason, deploying a QoS supported wireless voice application may remain a somewhat vendor specific consideration. Make sure to look at your options carefully.

The 802.11i standard addresses the security weakness in the original 802.11 standard. Articulating two approaches to solve this problem:

� Enhanced encryption that can be utilized on existing hardware.
� Enhanced encryption that may require hardware upgrades This standard specifies use of the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES).

As vendors make standards-compliant products available, it will be important to understand the impact of these standards with regard to the required voice quality of the wireless voice application. Applying the �software only� enhancements may impose additional latency burdens that will negatively impact the observed voice quality. In addition, conformance to the higher encryption standards may also require replacement of existing mobile devices with new, security compliant hardware.

TELEPHONY SERVICE OPTION CHANGES
Once you have a WLAN VoIP device, one of the other major considerations is the service that will be needed to supply the telephony services. There are basically two generic connection options:

� Telephony services derived from a Telephony Internet Service Provider (TISP) or IP-Centrex vendor.
� Telephony services derived from corporate PBX services.

Either option requires cooperation with the group that is supplying/supporting the service and the two options are typically mutually exclusive.

If the WLAN-VoIP initiative is a corporate driven program, selection of which option to follow will be dictated. Interfacing to a corporate wireless-VoIP service may evolve over time as paced by the corporation adoption of VoIP as a backbone voice service. Deployment of a corporate wireless VoIP solution that integrates into a PBX vendor�s system may require vendor-specific client VoIP firmware. However, if Wireless-VoIP is an independent requirement, there are a number of ISP/TISP services that are becoming available to support SOHO or home/hotspot wireless VoIP access. TISPs and IP-Centrex services will become a crowded, competitive landscape in the future, much like the competitive landscape for long-distance calling services and wide-area telephony services.

VoIP PROTOCOL CHANGES
In today�s wireless VoIP market, vendor proprietary protocols dominate. These protocols were developed and deployed out of necessity because the international VoIP standards were not sufficiently mature. In addition, none of the �standard� VoIP call control protocols address hardware specific device controls that are important for support of vendor specific value-add. Will this always be the case? No.

The IETF Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is challenging the status of ITU H.323 as the most popular standards-based call control. However, even SIP does not meet the requirements of many corporate customers and is still in the process of evolving to a richer set of features. Specifically, a working group has been formed and is defining an optimal expression of SIP for the wireless deployments (ITU T-41), but this effort has not been completed.

The maturing of any of the protocols, from a wireless perspective, will continue to provide more robust and feature rich choices to companies interested in deploying wireless VoIP solutions.

FORM FACTOR CHANGES
To date, all commercial WiFi voice devices have been voice-only �phones.� Appearing on the horizon is the option of using a PDA as a phone. In theory, any wireless-enabled PDA can become a phone by loading a �softphone� application. There are a number of �softphone� products available on the market, but many of them have not been fully optimized for the wireless LAN and don�t provide the same voice quality or reliability of commercially available wireless handsets. This situation, however, will change. As market demand increases, the reliability of these offerings will also increase. To meet these higher requirement levels, you may see softphone offerings that are �tuned� to specific hardware platforms and/or vendor specific wireless LAN infrastructures. Having a PDA with telephony capability can be a real asset for the mobile worker.

The holy grail of the mobile workforce, however, is the dual-mode phone. The ability to use the same device while in WLAN coverage and in WAN (GSM or CDMA) coverage is extremely appealing to a vast number of mobile workers. Sales/support people, doctors, lawyers and the like often carry two devices to get maximum accessibility and desire a single dual-mode device. To this end, there have been announcements by several major corporations of dual-mode phone availability beginning in mid/late 2004. While this single device approach may appear the ultimate solution, it is more likely that these initial offerings will not be as �seamless� in service or functionality as the consumer would like. Most likely, phased releases of increasing functional support will be made available to the market. Even these offerings will still have to address all the other complex challenges that have been previously identified for a simple WLAN phone.

SUMMARY
So, what does the future hold? Change. Changes on many fronts will impact the delivery of a wireless VoIP solution. In order to successfully manage the expected changes and navigate the churning vendor �waters,� it will be important to focus on the following areas:

� Define the exact wireless telephony requirements within your company. These become the baseline from which evaluation and selection of various wireless VoIP options are made.
� Understand and incorporate any corporate wireless LAN strategies/polices into selection of a final solution option (security and QoS).
� Identify and focus on any specific PBX (or PSTN) connectivity features that are required, as they will impact any final solution configuration.
� Fully understand the current and future support plans from the selected vendor to supply the wireless VoIP components. This will allow for making future transition plans for expected changes that impact either firmware or hardware.

The market demand is heating up for support of wireless VoIP applications and the population of commercial offerings increases almost daily. There are solid solutions available in today�s market but there is also a need to understand the �changes� on the horizon, which may shape today�s decisions for tomorrow�s use.

Richard Watson is director of telephony product marketing for Symbol Technologies� Wireless Systems Division in San Jose, CA. Prior to taking on the marketing role for Symbol�s NetVision family of WiFi Telephony products, he managed the software engineering team for three years and was responsible for developing Symbol�s WiFi Telephony products.

[ Return To The November 2003 Table Of Contents ]



Today @ TMC
Upcoming Events
ITEXPO West 2012
October 2- 5, 2012
The Austin Convention Center
Austin, Texas
MSPWorld
The World's Premier Managed Services and Cloud Computing Event
Click for Dates and Locations
Mobility Tech Conference & Expo
October 3- 5, 2012
The Austin Convention Center
Austin, Texas
Cloud Communications Summit
October 3- 5, 2012
The Austin Convention Center
Austin, Texas