TMCnet
ITEXPO begins in:   New Coverage :  Asterisk  |  Fax Software  |  SIP Phones  |  Small Cells
 

Feature Article
July 2004


Tackling Delay in Today's Global Voice Networks

BY GORDON OLIVER

There are three very important components of voice quality in today�s global telecommunications network: clarity, echo, and delay.

 

These attributes must be understood and managed in order to maintain voice quality in the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). While many consumers take voice quality for granted even in telephone conversations halfway around the globe, the network has evolved considerably over time to ensure this level of service.


The understanding of the mechanics of delay and the innovations built into the PSTN that has evolved to make the voice network delay-free is a tremendous engineering feat that makes long-distance telecommunications a monumental achievement. The global community developed strict standards to help overcome these technology hurdles and today�s networks are as efficient and as free of delay as they have ever been.


The latest technology introductions such as voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), Wireless Local Loop, and cellular phone traffic are offering new challenges for today�s voice networks. While these new technologies offer compelling capabilities that will ultimately usher in a new era in telecommunications, the long established standards governing minimum delays in communications shouldn�t be ignored if voice carriers are to keep customer satisfaction as a priority.


There were several good reasons why specifications governing network delay were put in place; however technology is changing so rapidly that there is a distinct possibility that unregulated technologies will undermine these specifications. As in the past though, this rapid integration of new products is completely manageable. Let�s look at some solutions that can avoid these delays.
 

EARLY NETWORKS: A HISTORICAL
PERSPECTIVE

In early telephone networks, it was a challenge to carry the voice far enough to experience delay and any noticeable echo. After all, a fraction of the speed of light was incomprehensively fast. When the standards in use today were developed, the challenges for preserving voice clarity had already been resolved using digitally sampled voice.


Digital processing of the voice requires sampling, storage, and switching, which leads to delays. To manage this potential for delays, strict specifications were introduced to avoid eroding the delay quality of the voice network. From this viewpoint, the shape and nature of the voice network has evolved. But the underlying specifications have not changed much, and these specs can be tough to meet as equipment densities increase.


VoIP, Mobile Wireless, and Wireless Local Loop networks can add significant amounts of delay, so it�s important to monitor the delay efficiency of circuit-switched TDM networks if it is to support these new services.


In the global voice networks, voice quality is key to retaining customers. In the case of wireless networks, it�s not just key to keeping customers but also to keeping them on the phone talking and generating revenue.
 

EFFECTS OF DELAY
The effects of delay on voice traffic can be severe, which is why the governing requirements are so strict.


Having good voice quality means that you can have a telephone conversation without any distracting or annoying effects � it really has to be just as clear and spontaneous as if the other person is right there in front of you. This way you know that any pauses or silences have meaning.

Delay and echo can be more frustrating than noise and may be present even on the clearest of lines. This is because delay and echo interrupt the rhythm of speech, which interrupts the flow of thought and makes it difficult to maintain the conversation.


Poor voice quality caused by echo and delay can lead to frustration, stressful conversations, and create customer churn. With pay-by-the-minute services like mobile and long distance, the business model usually requires frequent use to cover the fixed costs. A good quality line can mean much longer conversations and a more profitable service.

 

NUMBERS TELL THE STORY
Delay is the time it takes for the listener to hear the talker�s voice. Any one-way delay less than 100 milliseconds (ms) is not noticeable for most conversations and does not affect the flow of conversation. Though, highly interactive business tasks may not tolerate more than 50 ms of one-way delay.


If delay times are longer than 150 ms, it becomes difficult to know whose turn it is to talk. This adds a level of discomfort or even stress to the conversation. People are more likely to interrupt each other and certainly more likely to cut their call short.


After about 200�250 ms of delay, any interactive conversation needs perseverance; people are forced into an awkward, half-duplex conversation, much like talking on a one-way radio.


The negative effects of delay and echo are regulated in the PSTN to ensure high-quality voice connections. An accepted standard is 100 ms round-trip on any national network.


For the international leg of a long distance call, another 100 ms is allowed between any two countries. That provides a total delay budget for international calls of 300 ms round-trip, 100 ms for each country and 100 ms for the international trunk. A round trip total of 300 ms or 150 ms one-way delay is an acceptable limit for a high-quality link. Beyond this, voice quality and customer satisfaction drops off sharply.


An efficient transport network able to carry voice with minimal delay will be increasingly valuable when new technologies such as VoIP, mobile wireless, or wireless local loop become more common.


Examples of this traffic are now being delivered into the PSTN, but they are not always capable of meeting the strict PSTN delay standards. These services add enough value to offset some small reduction in overall voice quality, but problems may yet occur when too many sources of delay are added to the same voice call.

VoIP COMES INTO PLAY
VoIP is an exploding technology with attractive features driving its adoption.
Unlike the PSTN circuit-switched network, VoIP relies on bypassing the regulated PSTN and sending voice over the Internet. VoIP conventions for delay are a little bit more relaxed than the PSTN standards. An upper limit of 250 ms one-way, that some would argue is acceptable, will seem like a poor quality connection to a PSTN user.


The delay is primarily caused by the encoding, packetizing, queuing, switching, routing, and buffering in the VoIP equipment. A one-way delay of 150�200 ms is generally considered to be a reasonable target. In this range, the overall quality should be acceptable to most people.


Delay occurs when the voice signal is encoded. This can typically range from eight�20 ms. As the processing gets more complex with higher compression rates, this delay time grows. When encoding, there�s a tradeoff between bandwidth and delay. Historically, VoIP network equipment has been optimized for bandwidth but now bandwidth is cheaper. With VoIP, delay is likely to have the biggest affect on the user. Most VoIP equipment can minimize delay by increasing the bandwidth allocated to each voice channel.


Packetization delay is the time it takes to fill a packet with compressed speech and usually falls in the range of five�50 ms. There is a tradeoff between packetization delay and the load on the processor. Using short packets over high-speed trunks can easily shorten the delay, but because each packet requires overhead, more packets mean lower network efficiency.


With the recent activity from Independent Local Exchange Carriers (ILECs) and International Exchange Carrier (IXCs), the presumption is that bandwidth preservation has become a key motivator; they may not be motivated to minimize delay at the expense of bandwidth.

 

Queuing delay occurs as packets wait in router queues and typically range from seven�10 ms. Many modern routers can be configured to give priority to voice traffic, but this delay is still a concern on heavily congested networks that mix voice and data traffic. Not all routers will be able to differentiate voice from data, especially in the Internet.


Because of the nature of the packet network, not all packets take the same time or even the same path to the destination. This means the time of their arrival varies, so data needs to be stored in a First In, First Out device (FIFO) prior to decoding. The maximum delay in a jitter buffer is configurable but is typically set between 40 and 60 ms.


Many of the delays in a VoIP call are a product of the codecs, bandwidth, packet size and quality and can be dynamically adjusted to suit quality of service (QoS) requirements. Some delays are the product of the components and traffic flowing in the Internet itself. These delays can be queuing delays in routers, head of line blocking when mixed with big data packets, etc.


One way to avoid these delays is not to use a shared network. Ethernet over Synchronous Optical Network (SONET) provides another option that is currently becoming more popular with network managers. This bypasses the shared �Internet cloud� and can remove ambiguity in delay caused by other traffic by using the circuit switched network. It cannot eliminate propogation delay but may assist in keeping a delay budget down to acceptable values.

TODAY�S NETWORKS:
LOOKING FORWARD

The global voice network is becoming more and more complex. Today, a variety of transport and coding technologies may be carrying your voice across the network and each time the format is changed, delay will be introduced. We must keep this network efficient if we are to preserve the high voice quality levels we have today. When designing new equipment and new networks, delay should be one of the more important considerations.
 

Voice today generates a huge amount of revenue for our industry. It is going to continue to attract investment and new entrants. Recent moves flirting with deregulation of the telephone networks highlight the possibilities for rapid changes in technologies and methods. Some caution must be applied if the voice networks are to remain the high-quality service they are today. These new services will no doubt be deployed, but the underlying quality of voice connection will determine the adoption rate and long-term success of these new services. Managing network delay along with the other aspects of voice quality will go a long way to securing these new revenue streams.

 

Gordon Oliver is currently responsible for SONET/ SDH PDH interworking solutions including the TEMAP/OCTLIU (T1/E1 Transport, Test Access and Transmultiplexer) product families at PMC-Sierra. Prior to joining PMC-Sierra, he was a Hardware Team Leader at NEC Australia�s Multimedia Research Laboratory developing ATM PON-based VDSL equipment.


If you are interested in purchasing reprints of this article (in either print or HTML format), please visit Reprint Management Services online at www.reprintbuyer.com or contact a representative via e-mail at reprints@tmcnet.com or by phone at 800-290-5460.

[ Return To The July 2004 Table Of Contents ]

 


Today @ TMC
Upcoming Events
ITEXPO West 2012
October 2- 5, 2012
The Austin Convention Center
Austin, Texas
MSPWorld
The World's Premier Managed Services and Cloud Computing Event
Click for Dates and Locations
Mobility Tech Conference & Expo
October 3- 5, 2012
The Austin Convention Center
Austin, Texas
Cloud Communications Summit
October 3- 5, 2012
The Austin Convention Center
Austin, Texas