The first phase of Anaheim, California's network launched today, but controversy continues to dog current thinking about city-wide wireless.
TMCnet
TMC Launches New Sites ::  NGC  |  4GWE  |  Green Tech  |  Satellite  |  IT |  IVR |  ITEXPO SHOW NEWS  |  Healthcare  |  Cisco News  |  Skype News  |  Microsoft News  |  AVAYA News
  INDUSTRIES
  VERTICALS
  HORIZONTAL
  PUBLICATIONS
  FREE RESOURCES
  INTERNATIONAL
  EVENTS
  ABOUT TMC
  COMMUNITIES
Share
TMCnews
[June 29, 2006]

The first phase of Anaheim, California's network launched today, but controversy continues to dog current thinking about city-wide wireless.

(www.wi-fiplanet.com Via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge)
As of today at 11am Pacific, the ceremonial wire was to be cut to show Anaheim, California's city-wide Wi-Fi network was in business. The network is the first Earthlink Wi-Fi courtesy of the company's Municipal Networks business unit . It's not quite the largest in the United States yet as of today they've only rolled out about 6 square miles out of 50 for the entire city.



Earthlink uses Motorola as the systems integrator installing its networks, with the preferred equipment from Tropos Networks for Wi-Fi mesh nodes and. Audra Hoynacki, the general manager for Earthlink Wi-Fi in Anaheim, says when all is done, there will be about 1,500 Tropos nodes hanging on poles in town. They connect wirelessly to Motorola's own MOTOwi4 Canopy products placed on strategic rooftops in town for backhaul. (The largest in the world is currently Taipei, Taiwan, at around 52 square miles with about 5,100 access points.)

"We're scheduled for build out by the end of the year," says Hoynacki. "It's in phases as we acquire rooftop lease agreements."



Founded in 1994, Earthlink made its name as a dial-up Internet service provider (ISP). It is trying to revamp itself into a municipal wireless provider as its dial-up business dies out. Earthlink currently has agreements, if not signed contracts, to deploy mesh networks in seven other U.S. cities: Arlington, Virginia; San Francisco, Long Beach, Milpitas, and Pasadena, California; Philadelphia and New Orleans.

Cost to users in Anaheim (pop. 345,000; tenth largest in California and home of DisneyLand and the Mighty Ducks of the NHL) is $17.95 per months for the first three months, going up to $22 a month after if you have a 12 month subscription (its $70 to cancel early). The speed is promised as 1 Megabit per second for downloads. Subscribers get 8 mailboxes and EarthLink's tools for spam blocking.

Wi-Fi should be accessible from any outdoor spot in the coverage area. Residential customers can be outfitted with a customer premises unit (CPE) from PePLink that will help the Wi-Fi signal penetrate walls. It can be hooked directly to computers, or to a router if the household wants its own in-house Wi-Fi network. The PePLink equipment uses technology called Tropos Metro Compatible Extensions (TMCX).

The network is offered with "open access" to third party providers that want to piggy-back on it to offer services to customers the exact position Earthlink has been in for years, running on other company's lines for dial-up and cable/DSL broadband. Earthlink's ability to do that has been hampered lately by court cases throwing out wholesale rates on cable and DSL and the Federal Communications Commission's reclassification of DSL as an information service , not a phone service, meaning phone companies providing DSL wouldn't have to share their lines without charging for it.

The Anaheim deployment comes after months big cities primarily Earthlink's future customers San Francisco and Philadelphia getting big press about their plans. Recently it's been called into question whether municipal wireless, perhaps using Wi-Fi in particular, will work. Small towns such as Chaska, Minnesota, previously thought to be successful, revealed that they had severe hiccups. At least to start.

While the informal backlash begins, the federal government is making moves to make it easier for municipalities to create Wi-Fi networks. The Senate Commerce Committee voted Wednesday that states can't prohibit municipal run broadband. The bill, called the Communications, Consumer's Choice, and Broadband Deployment Act, now goes to the Senate. The House of Representatives has its own telecom bill with different wording; both will have to be reconciled.

This follows a couple of years of state governments running for and against, depending on where you are. For instance, when Philadelphia announced plans to do city-wide Wi-Fi (even before Earthlink was involved) a state law was passed making municipal run broadband networks illegal without a waiver from local broadband providers. Philadelphia's plan was grandfathered.

Earthlink favors the Senate bill. In most cases of municipal Wi-Fi these days, it's not the city getting into the broadband business anyway. Earthlink, for example, pays for everything deployment, training, and management while granting the city discounts for access in return for access rights to poles and buildings for installing equipment. Hoynacki says Earthlink pays $1 per pole per year for the right to hang the Tropos nodes. More and more requests for proposal (RFPs) from municipalities require this kind give and take from vendors.

The other problem some consider facing municipal networks is that of the privacy of individual users. Earthlink and Google have been taken to task for this by the EPIC, EFF and the ACLU over their joint plans for the San Francisco Wi-Fi rollout , which is still under negotiation with the city, but will certainly include limited (300Kbps) free access. At the GoogleBlog yesterday, a letter was posted from Christopher Shea, Google's head of Special Initiatives addressing privacy. It said, "our proposed Wi-Fi service will embody standards of privacy higher than those of major access networks in existence today." For instance, while EPIC/EFF/ACLU want no sign in required, Google says it will be "minimal registration" requiring a Google Account like that used to access Gmail or other Google services. Google plans to purge info related to free access every six months, but could not speak for Earthlink, which will charge for higher bandwidth connections, probably with the same pricing its using in Anaheim.

Hoynacki couldn't address the San Francisco privacy concerns, but did say that, obviously, Anaheim users will have to log in and be certified at paying customers to get network access. There's no free service in Anaheim as yet. That would have to come from a third-party provider that wants to give access away using Earthlink's infrastructure a privilege for which it would have to pay Earthlink.

Earthlink is already heavily in the throes of marketing the network as they roll it out. They've sent out mailings and tonight are one of the sponsors of the Taste of Anaheim , where they will sign up customers or put those outside of the current service area on a wait list.

Internet.com Corp.

Copyright 2003 Jupitermedia Corp. All rights reserved.
Republication and redistribution of Jupitermeida Corp. content is
Expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Jupitermedia
Corp.. Jupitermedia Corp., shall not be liable for any errors
or delays in the Content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

[ Back To TMCnet.com's Homepage ]


Discussions:
Be the first to post a comment on this page!
 
By  
TMCnet
Featured White Papers
Top Stories
Related VoIP News

Subscribe FREE to all of TMC's monthly magazines. Click here now.