TMCnet News

TELUS Reports Second Quarter Results
[August 05, 2005]

TELUS Reports Second Quarter Results


VANCOUVER, Aug. 5 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- TELUS Corporation (TSX: T and T.NV / NYSE: TU) today reported strong financial results for the second quarter of 2005 reflecting excellent wireless performance at TELUS Mobility, good revenue growth at TELUS Communications and a significant increase in consolidated earnings. Consolidated operating revenues of $2.0 billion in the quarter increased 8% from a year ago and operating income was up 24%. Earnings per share for the second quarter were 53 cents, up 10% compared with 48 cents for the same period a year ago. Earnings per share for the second quarter included a one time three cent negative accrual arising from a legal proceeding related to a 1997 debt transaction, and the second quarter of 2004 benefited from 13 cents in positive tax related adjustments.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
C$ in millions, except per share amounts 3 months ended
June 30
(unaudited) 2005 2004 % Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating revenues 2,018.5 1,865.6 8.2
EBITDA(1) 865.0 784.8 10.2
Operating income 465.9 377.2 23.5
Net income 189.5 172.3 10.0
Earnings per share (EPS), basic(2) 0.53 0.48 10.4
Capital expenditures 408.7 346.1 18.1
Cash provided by operating activities 687.7 489.0 40.6
Free cash flow(3) 207.8 229.5 (9.5)

(1) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) is defined as Operating revenues less Operations expense
less Restructuring and workforce reduction costs. See Section 11.1 of
Management's discussion and analysis.
(2) EPS includes favourable tax settlement impact of 13 cents for the
three month period in 2004.
(3) See Section 11.2 of Management's discussion and analysis.


Darren Entwistle, president and CEO, stated "TELUS second quarter results were strong across the board with an eight per cent increase in revenue driven by our consistent strategic focus on delivering wireless and data growth. Our Company's EBITDA and bottom line EPS was up a reported 10 per cent. Indeed, after adjusting for non-recurring items, EPS increased 60 per cent. As highlighted last quarter, we are striving to bring the collective bargaining process to a positive conclusion for all stakeholders. A major positive step forward was taken in July as we commenced implementation of a new comprehensive collective agreement for TWU bargaining unit employees. While the recent strike action by the TWU presents a challenge for employees and some customers, I am heartened by the support of management and bargaining unit team members alike that have responded positively to the work stoppage in support of TELUS and our customers. Approximately 70 per cent of our team members continue to work to serve our customers. Our desire at the end of the day is to have all unionized team members share in our ongoing financial success, which our comprehensive offer ensures."
Robert McFarlane, executive vice president and CFO, commented that "we generated record quarterly wireless revenue and EBITDA in addition to setting a new second quarter record for cash flow and subscriber additions. We were also pleased with our wireline revenue growth, led by strong data results while local and long distance revenue were stable in the face of increased competitive pressure and line losses. TELUS continues to produce significant quarterly free cash flow of over $200 million. After repurchasing 6.5 million shares during the quarter for an outlay of $272 million, TELUS still maintained a significant cash balance of $1.1 billion at quarter end. We are ready to distribute approximately $200 million of past period and lump sum payments to TWU employees on ratification of their new collective agreement. Reflecting positive year to date results and the successful implementation of our emergency operations plan to address the labour disruption in Western Canada, we are maintaining our existing 2005 guidance."
OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

TELUS Mobility
Strong cash flow improvement of $44 million driven by 19% revenue growth
and significant margin expansion
- revenues increased by $125 million or 19% to $802 million in the
second quarter of 2005, when compared with the same period in 2004
- EBITDA increased by $80 million or 28% to $367 million
- EBITDA margin expanded by 3.5 points to 49% of network revenue, and by
3.4 points to 45% of total revenue
- ARPU (average revenue per subscriber unit) increased markedly by $2
to $61
- cost of acquisition ("COA") per gross subscriber improved to $342
from $381
- net subscriber additions of 131,100 in the quarter, improved 15% from
a year ago. Notably, higher revenue-generating postpaid subscriber net
additions of 103,900 represented 79% of total net additions
- blended monthly churn increased slightly to 1.37% from 1.32% when
compared to the same quarter a year ago. Post paid churn was 1.05%.
- cash flow (EBITDA less capital expenditures) increased by $44 million
or 21% to $252 million

TELUS Communications
Strong data growth with stable long distance revenues result in increased
operating revenues
- revenues increased by $28 million or 2% to $1,217 million in the
second quarter of 2005, when compared with the same period in 2004
representing a fourth consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth
- data revenue increased 10% driven by increased Internet and enhanced
data service revenues
- strong 19% increase in non-incumbent revenues in Ontario and Quebec to
$156 million creating a third consecutive quarter of profitability
- long-distance revenue was flat, reversing the trend of year-over-year
revenue declines
- EBITDA was flat in the quarter, compared to the same quarter a year
ago, due to 2% revenue growth offset by increased competitive
activity, restructuring and emergency operations planning costs
- high-speed Internet net additions were 17,100 in the second quarter,
bringing TELUS' total high-speed Internet subscriber base to 729,000,
a 17% increase from last year
- network access lines of 4.7 million, declined 86,000 or 1.8% from a
year ago due to competitive activity and wireless substitution
- cash flow (EBITDA less capital expenditures) decreased by $26 million
or 11% to $205 million in the second quarter, compared to the same
period a year ago, due to higher capital expenditures

CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS

Move to resolve collective bargaining escalates into work action

After four and a half years without a collective agreement and with legal blockages largely removed, TELUS escalated the collective bargaining process towards resolution - a top corporate priority for 2005. More than 13,000 of TELUS' 28,700 employees are represented by the Telecommunications Communication Workers Union (TWU) bargaining unit.
A number of legal challenges and appeals were decided in the last quarter by the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) and the courts, which in most cases supported TELUS' actions and allowed events to move forward. In April, the TWU lost appeals to the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) and CIRB that challenged the Company on its implementing of "soft" lockout measures, which did not close operations. In July, the CIRB ruled that TELUS did not contravene the Labour Code in distributing its comprehensive offer (Offer) directly to employees and therefore rejected the remedy of returning the parties to binding arbitration. Also in July, the FCA ruled against the TWU appeal of the CIRB decision in February that put the parties back into negotiations instead of binding arbitration. In June, the Supreme Court of Canada denied the Company's application for leave to appeal the CIRB decision, which put TELUS Mobility's non-unionized team members, predominantly located in Ontario and Quebec, into the TWU bargaining unit without a representational vote. In addition, the CIRB ruled in July that TELUS did not provide information concerning these employees early enough to the TWU. These last two rulings did not impede the escalation of events towards resolving collective bargaining. Finally, in late July the Company won broad injunctions from the courts in British Columbia and Alberta that prevents picket lines from unlawfully impeding access to TELUS and customer locations.
Both the Company and the TWU have taken measures to escalate the pressure on each other to reach settlement. The Company retabled its comprehensive Offer to the TWU on April 13 and on April 18, declared negotiations to be at an impasse and delivered a first notice of lockout to the TWU. The notice, effective April 25, which did not include the closing of operations, included a number of measures, such as the suspension of grievance and arbitration processes, scheduling of accumulated time off, and the deferral of wage progression increases and increases in vacation entitlements. The Company communicated the terms and conditions of that offer to bargaining unit team members on April 21. TELUS further escalated lockout measures during the period May through July.
Similarly, the TWU escalated its strike measures by imposing an overtime and relieving management ban and announcing a work-to-rule campaign. TELUS tabled an addendum to the Offer with the TWU on June 14, which provided clarifications and adjustments to the April 13 offer, to benefit employees and to provide incentives for settlement prior to September 1. On June 22, the TWU tabled its counter proposal to TELUS, which was reviewed and rejected on June 24 because it failed in any meaningful fashion to address TELUS' need for improved productivity and flexibility and widened the gap between the parties with respect to some key aspects, such as contract duration and reduction of extra days off. The TWU also began rotating strike activity in early July, in the form of "study sessions," to which management usually responded by imposing lockouts for those employees who participated in the activity.
On July 12, TELUS announced its intent to implement certain portions of its Offer of settlement commencing July 22, 2005. The Offer includes at a minimum annual two percent base wage increases generally, additional variable performance pay of three, four and five percent over the next three years, and wage harmonization between Alberta and BC. The Offer would make TELUS bargaining unit members the best paid in Canada. Contracting out language is typical of the pre-existing Alberta contract and other communication company contracts in North America. The TWU responded by initiating full strike activity on July 21. The TELUS Offer has never been presented by the TWU to its membership for a ratification vote and, although not legally required given TELUS' implementation of lockout measures, the last union strike vote was conducted in January 2004. In response to the TWU's escalation of strike activity, TELUS implemented its contingency plans designed to minimize the impact on customers, and on July 22 commenced implementation of its Offer. The implementation of the Offer does not include the lump sum and retroactive payments, which total approximately $200 million, nor certain pension and benefit proposals, which only become effective following ratification of the Offer of settlement. There are a number of incentives in place, if the collective agreement is ratified by September 1, 2005.
Significant and increasing numbers of employees in Alberta and currently all employees East of Alberta are choosing to continue work, which provides support to managers' efforts to maintain customer service.
Update on TELUS share repurchases
During the quarter, TELUS continued to purchase shares under its Normal Course Issuer Bid. In the second quarter, a total of 6.5 million shares (2,972,500 common and 3,540,200 non-voting) were purchased, for a total outlay of $272.0 million.
TELUS commenced the program on December 20, 2004 with the intention to purchase and cancel, from time to time over a 12-month period, up to 14 million of its outstanding common shares and up to 11.5 million of its outstanding non-voting shares. This represents approximately seven per cent of the issued and outstanding shares in each share class. Since the program commenced, a total of 12.9 million shares (5,825,311 common and 7,027,700 non-voting) have been purchased, for a total outlay of $508.4 million, representing 50% of the 25.5 million shares authorized under the program.
TELUS believes that such purchases are in the best interest of TELUS and constitute an attractive investment opportunity and desirable use of TELUS' funds that should enhance the value of the remaining shares.
TELUS redeems C$150 million of convertible debentures
On June 16, 2005, TELUS redeemed its publicly issued 6.75% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures due June 15, 2010 at par plus accrued interest. Each convertible debenture was convertible at the option of the holder into TELUS non-voting shares at the conversion price of $39.73 per share.
Given the recent increase in share price over the conversion price, approximately 88% of holders elected to convert to non-voting shares and over 3.3 million non-voting shares were issued. The total cash outlay for the remaining debentures not converted was $18 million.
TELUS receives credit rating enhancements
In June, Moody's Investors Services announced it had upgraded the Senior Unsecured rating of TELUS Corporation to Baa2 from Baa3 with a stable outlook. This rating increase brings Moody's rating of TELUS in line with the BBB-mid investment grade ratings maintained by Standard & Poor's, Dominion Bond Rating Services and Fitch Ratings. The rating upgrade reflects Moody's expectation for the continued strength of TELUS' operating results.
Also in the second quarter, Fitch revised TELUS' credit rating outlook to positive from stable. The positive rating outlook reflects Fitch's view that TELUS will continue to improve its credit profile through growth in cash flows, driven by wireless operations and expectations for further debt reduction. Standard & Poor's and Fitch now maintain positive outlooks, while Dominion Bond Rating Services maintains a stable trend.
TELUS and Telephony @Work launch CallCentreAnywhere
TELUS has an exclusive partnership with Telephony@Work, a worldwide leader in adaptive IP contact centre technology for enterprises and service providers, to launch Canada's first fully integrated on-demand hosted contact centre service, CallCentreAnywhere. The service brings together TELUS' leading data and IP technology and Telephony@Work's contact centre software to streamline all methods of customer contact (phone, email, fax, online, or voice mail) through a single IP-based system that eliminates the technical complexity of managing the various means of customer communications.
TELUS' CallCentreAnywhere will be launching with seven new customers, including Canada Post's InnovaPost and the Canadian Red Cross.
Innovapost, the technical division of Canada Post, is being trialed in Calgary with its new service offering called fetch(TM). InnovaPost developed the fetch technology after Canada Post recognized that many consumers want to know more about products or services they have seen advertised, without providing the advertisers with too much personal information. fetch provides Canadians with the information they want, while screening their personal details from advertisers.
CallCentreAnywhere is being adopted by the Red Cross' B.C. Disaster Response Centre. TELUS is sponsoring the implementation of a $1.5 million call centre capable of handling public enquiries from across Canada faster and more effectively. Rather than having phones on folding tables in emergency situations like the Tsunami in December, the new Red Cross Disaster call centre will have banks of stations, complete with computers, where volunteers can take information from a call, email or fax and route it into a single Internet Protocol-based system. It should tremendously reduce the time spent on each call, while increasing the accuracy and effectiveness of the information being gathered.
Regulatory Developments

Regulatory framework for voice communication services using
Internet protocol


On May 12, 2005, the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) released its decision regarding regulatory requirements for the provision of voice communication services using Internet protocol, also known as VoIP. This decision divides VoIP service providers into two groups: incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs) such as TELUS who are regulated in a manner similar to existing local service regulation in regards to price regulation and win-back restrictions; and others, including cable-TV companies, who are not subject to those regulations. TELUS and other ILECs have sought leave to appeal the regulation on win-backs with the Federal Court, arguing that it infringes on the companies' constitutional rights to commercial free speech.
On July 28, TELUS, along with BCE, SaskTel and Aliant, announced a joint Federal Cabinet appeal of the VoIP decision.
Proceeding on local exchange services forbearance
The CRTC announced it will be examining issues in relation to forbearance including: relevant markets, CRTC powers and duties that should be forborne, and the post-forbearance criteria and conditions that might apply. The proceeding will also consider the possibility of providing ILECs with more regulatory flexibility prior to forbearance. A decision is expected in the first quarter of 2006.
TELUS' position is that the CRTC must adopt a clear, simple test that will allow ILEC's to gain automatic deregulation when certain measurable benchmarks are reached. Under TELUS' proposal, the Company would simply file evidence that a full facilities-based CLEC has achieved five per cent of the local exchange service market for business or residential services in the CLEC's service area. The CRTC would then have 30 days to issue a forbearance order.
Proceeding to consider extending the price regulation regime
On May 13, 2005, the CRTC proposed to extend the current price cap regime without any changes for two additional years beyond the currently anticipated end date of May 31, 2006. In filing its comments, TELUS asked the CRTC to stop the flow of funds into the deferral account and requested that incumbents be allowed to reduce prices for residential services in non-high-cost areas and for business services where customers have a choice of local telephone service suppliers. TELUS committed that it would not increase rates in other service areas in order to offset any rate reductions resulting from these changes.
TELUS Mobility
TELUS Mobility introduced several new phones in the second quarter confirming its leadership in bringing cool and exclusive phones to the Canadian wireless market. The new products included two new PCS Push To Talk phones, four stylish and affordable PCS phones and a ruggedized Mike device.
Push To Talk expansion
With its Mike iDEN and Instant Talk CDMA services, TELUS Mobility continues to dominate the Push To Talk (PTT) market in Canada. In the second quarter, TELUS Mobility introduced two new Instant Talk phones: The LG 4750, a clamshell design featuring an integrated speakerphone with exceptional sound quality, and the KX440Y, a high-visibility yellow version of the Kyocera KX440. With four different Instant Talk models, TELUS offers the broadest selection of PCS PTT phones in Canada.
TELUS Mobility also expanded its selection of Mike phones with the Motorola i355, a tough, multifunctional mobile communications tool for field-service workers and other clients who need a rugged instant-contact handset. Joining a roster of more than a dozen all-in-one Mike devices, the Motorola i355 features Global Positioning System (GPS) capability and Mike's Talk Around, which lets clients use their phones as walkie talkies, even when outside network coverage areas.
New PCS phones and international roaming
TELUS Mobility rolled out several new exclusive and affordable PCS phones from partners LG Electronics, Motorola, Samsung and UTStarcom (formerly Audiovox):
- The LG 125 is an affordable clamshell phone available in vibrant
green/white and silver/white design that features an internal antenna,
a 32-tone polyphonic ringer, and a calendar, calculator and alarm.
- Two new PCS phones from Motorola, the V265 and the V262, feature fuse
advanced speech recognition capabilities with a variety of
personalization, entertainment and productivity tools. The Motorola
V265 integrates a camera with digital zoom, speakerphone and Personal
Information Manager into its clam shell design. Built for
personalization, the Motorola V262 offers changeable blue or silver
face plates, and an integrated speakerphone supporting its advance
speech recognition capability.
- The Samsung A570 is a compact black-and-silver flip phone featuring
both a full-sized colour screen and external LCD display, and
"do more" features such as downloadable ring tones, images and games.
- The UTStarcom 860 features a sleek red, black and silver exterior
"candy bar" design, digital camera, colour screen, voice activated
dialing, commands and memo features, a 32-chord polyphonic ringer and
downloadable ringtones, images and games.


TELUS Mobility announced that its PCS clients can now use their wireless phones while travelling in mainland China, New Zealand and Taiwan. PCS clients already use their phones while travelling in Bermuda, the Dominican Republic, Guam, Hong Kong, Mexico, Puerto Rico, South Korea, the US Virgin Islands, Venezuela and of course across the United States.
TELUS Mobility announces Mission Critical Data solution
In May, TELUS Mobility introduced its Multi-Network Data Access (MNDA) solution, a reliable way for public safety and enterprise clients to access mission critical data wirelessly and pass it between data networks without losing connections. Built around IBM's WebSphere Everyplace Connection Manager, MNDA optimizes bandwidth and allows clients to roam seamlessly across different wireless data networks - including 1X data networks such as TELUS Mobility PCS, iDEN networks such as Mike and Wi-Fi networks. It also greatly reduces the start-up and operational costs associated with building similar in-house solutions.
TELUS Mobility expands award-winning retail outlets
In June, TELUS Mobility opened two state-of-the-art corporate retail locations in Quebec City, offering fashionable shopping environments that reflect TELUS Mobility's unique future friendly retail approach. The new store locations are part of TELUS Mobility's national network of more than 3,000 retail locations, including more than 100 corporate stores. In March, TELUS Mobility won the prestigious National Association of Store Fixture Manufacturers (NASFM) award for International Store of the Year.
20 years of wireless in Canada
July 1 marked the 20th anniversary of wireless communications in Canada. From humble beginnings, the industry has grown to encompass 15 million customers - almost 50 per cent of the total population - with digital coverage available to 94 per cent of Canadians from sea to sea. Canada's wireless carriers have made infrastructure investments of some $20 billion over the last two decades, and the industry now accounts for more than 25,000 direct, high-value jobs in Canada. The fast pace of growth continues. This year alone, it's estimated 1.5 million Canadians will buy new wireless phones, as many as joined the industry in its first 10 years.
July 1 also marked the introduction of inter-carrier Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), allowing customers to wirelessly send and receive picture, video and sound files to and from MMS-capable phones, regardless of a recipient's carrier. The initiative is similar to the inter-carrier text messaging service launched by Canada's carriers in 2002, which has led to growth in messaging traffic of at least 100 per cent every year since. Canadians now send almost 40 million phone-to-phone text messages each month, and are on track to send a total of 1.5 billion this year.
Brian Canfield recognized for contribution to TELUS
The Burnaby building, where more than 2,400 TELUS team members work, was named in honour of Brian Canfield's outstanding contribution to the advancement of Canada's telecommunications industry during his distinguished 49-year career with TELUS. The Brian Canfield Centre for Excellence in Telecommunications building honours Mr. Canfield, the former president and CEO and now chairman of the TELUS board of directors.
TELUS recognized for excellence
Based upon TELUS' continued excellent performance in customer service, for the second time in a year, an industry study has concluded TELUS is the top national directory assistance provider in Canada. The Paisley Group Ltd., a directory assistance/operator services consulting company, rated TELUS as the highest rated provider in last September's survey. TELUS maintained that position in the recently released spring Index, in which TELUS earned a 91 per cent passed calls mark. The Paisley Group describes passed calls as the hallmark of directory assistance, measuring whether customers both received correct information and were treated in an appropriate manner.
TELUS was also honoured for excellence in employee development with the Program of the Year award at the recent SkillSoft conference. TELUS won the award for two of its leadership and development programs: one, a blended learning program for training frontline staff in TELUS' credit department, and the other, a comprehensive leadership development program for all levels of the organization. To be considered for the award, companies must demonstrate successful measured results in terms of return on investment, increased usage, a timeline for implementation, complexity, and a marketing strategy.
Creating future friendly communities
TELUS continues to make significant investments in the communities where we live work and serve. We are committed to becoming Canada's premier corporate citizen, and take a leadership role in supporting Canadians by leveraging our funding, technology and expertise to help make a difference.
In the second quarter of 2005, TELUS supported numerous community programs and organizations including:
- the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute with a $1 million contribution
to further its goal of world-class care and progressive research for
the prevention and treatment of heart disease.
- KidSport BC's TELUS Little Links Program with a $125,000 donation
raised during the TELUS Skins Game in Whistler. TELUS donated $2,000
for each birdie, $3,000 for each eagle and $1 per yard for every drive
off the tee of two designated holes by TELUS Skins golfers
Jack Nicklaus, Vijay Singh, John Daly and Stephen Ames. This
charitable donation funds registration fees and equipment costs for
kids who cannot afford to join leagues.
- TELUS Tour for the Cure, launched in Vancouver in September 2004,
visited 28 communities across British Columbia and ended in May 2005.
Through this program, more than 200,000 people learned about breast
cancer and screening mammograms.
- hosting a volunteer fair to help recruit for the Edmonton 2005
World Masters Games. As the volunteer program sponsor, TELUS team
members rose to the challenge and provided 600 of the 5,200 volunteers
needed.


TELUS is also committed to being an environmental leader and has launched a pilot project introducing 10 gasoline-electric hybrid Toyota Prius sedans to the company fleet in several major markets. The project will determine the cost-effectiveness and environmental benefits of integrating hybrid vehicles into the company's national fleet of more than 5,000 vehicles.
Dividend declaration
The Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of twenty cents ($0.20) per share on outstanding Common and Non-Voting Shares payable on October 1, 2005 to shareholders of record on the close of business on September 9, 2005.
Forward-looking statements
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This document and the Management's discussion and analysis contain
statements about expected future events and financial and operating
results of TELUS Corporation ("TELUS" or the "Company") that are forward-
looking. By their nature, forward-looking statements require the Company
to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties.
There is significant risk that predictions and other forward-looking
statements will not prove to be accurate. Readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a number of factors
could cause actual future results, conditions, actions or events to
differ materially from the targets, guidance, expectations, estimates or
intentions expressed in the forward-looking statements.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include but
are not limited to: competition; economic fluctuations; financing and
debt requirements; tax matters; human resources (including the ongoing
impact and outcome of outstanding labour relations issues and the
duration and impact of full-scale strike related activity); technology
(including reliance on systems and information technology); regulatory
developments; process risks (including conversion of legacy systems);
manmade and natural threats; health and safety; litigation; business
continuity events; and other risk factors discussed herein and listed
from time to time in TELUS' reports, comprehensive public disclosure
documents including the 2004 Annual Report, Annual Information Form, and
in other filings with securities commissions in Canada (filed on SEDAR at
http://www.sedar.com/) and the United States (filed on EDGAR at http://www.sec.gov/).

For further information, see Section 10: Risks and uncertainties in
TELUS' annual 2004 and interim first quarter 2005 Management's
discussions and analysis, as well as updates included in Section 10 of
this second quarter interim report.

The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Management's discussion and analysis - August 3, 2005


The following is a discussion of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of TELUS Corporation for the periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and should be read together with TELUS' interim consolidated financial statements. This discussion contains forward-looking information that is qualified by reference to, and should be read together with, the discussion regarding forward-looking statements above.
TELUS' interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), which differ in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. See Note 18 to the interim consolidated financial statements for a summary of the principal differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP as they relate to TELUS. The interim consolidated financial statements and Management's discussion and analysis were reviewed by TELUS' Audit Committee on August 2, 2005 and approved by TELUS' Board of Directors on August 3, 2005. All amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise specified.
The Company has issued guidance on and reports on certain non-GAAP measures that are used by management to evaluate performance of business units and segments. Non-GAAP measures are used in measuring compliance with debt covenants. Because non-GAAP measures do not have a standardized meaning, securities regulations require that non-GAAP measures be clearly defined and qualified, and reconciled with their nearest GAAP measure. For the readers' reference, the definition, calculation and reconciliation of consolidated non- GAAP measures is provided in Section 11: Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures and definition of key operating indicators.
Management's discussion and analysis contents

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Contents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Overall performance A summary of consolidated results for the
second quarter and first six months of 2005
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Core business, vision Recent examples of TELUS' activities in
and strategy support of its six strategic imperatives
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Key performance drivers Recent examples of TELUS' activities in
support of its key performance drivers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Capability to deliver An update on TELUS' capability to deliver
results results
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Results from operations A detailed discussion of operating results
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Financial condition A discussion of significant changes in the
balance sheet since the beginning of the year
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Liquidity and capital A discussion of cash flow, liquidity, credit
resources facilities, off-balance sheet arrangements
and other disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Critical accounting A description of accounting estimates, which
estimates and are critical to determining financial
accounting policy results, and changes to accounting policies
developments
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Revised guidance A discussion of revisions to its guidance for
2005
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Risks and A update of risks and uncertainties facing
uncertainties TELUS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Reconciliation of A description, calculation and reconciliation
non-GAAP measures and of certain measures used by management
definition of key
operating indicators
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


1. Overall performance

1.1 Materiality for disclosures

Management determines whether or not information is "material" based on
whether it believes a reasonable investor's decision to buy, sell or hold
securities in the Company would likely be influenced or changed if the
information were omitted or misstated.

1.2 Consolidated highlights

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
($ millions except Quarters Six-month periods
margin and per- ended June 30 ended June 30
share amounts) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating revenues 2,018.5 1,865.6 8.2 % 3,993.2 3,669.4 8.8 %

EBITDA(1) 865.0 784.8 10.2 % 1,721.2 1,506.1 14.3 %
EBITDA margin (%)(2) 42.9 42.1 0.8 pts 43.1 41.0 2.1 pts

Operating income 465.9 377.2 23.5 % 919.9 688.1 33.7 %

Net income 189.5 172.3 10.0 % 431.7 273.6 57.8 %

Earnings per share,
basic 0.53 0.48 10.4 % 1.20 0.76 57.9 %
Earnings per share,
diluted 0.52 0.48 8.3 % 1.19 0.76 56.6 %

Cash dividends
declared per share 0.20 0.15 33.3 % 0.40 0.30 33.3 %

Cash provided by
operating activities 687.7 489.0 40.6 % 1,416.1 1,077.1 31.5 %
Cash used by investing
activities 410.0 341.6 20.0 % 716.2 640.2 11.9 %
Capital
expenditures 408.7 346.1 18.1 % 681.9 655.8 4.0 %
Cash used by
financing activities 383.9 63.2 n.m. 455.3 85.4 n.m.

Free cash flow(3) 207.8 229.5 (9.5)% 774.4 672.8 15.1 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
pts - percentage points
n.m. - not meaningful
(1) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA") is a non-GAAP measure. See Section 11.1 Earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
(2) EBITDA margin is EBITDA divided by Operating revenues.
(3) Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure. See Section 11.2 Free cash
flow.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Consolidated Operating revenues experienced strong growth in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004, driven by more than 18% revenue growth at TELUS Mobility and revenue growth of 2 to 3% in TELUS' Communications segment. Consolidated EBITDA and EBITDA margins also increased as operations expense growth at TELUS Mobility was contained to rates well below its revenue growth rates. Communications segment second quarter 2005 EBITDA was flat despite increased competitive activity and costs associated with emergency operations planning, when compared with 2004. For the first six months of 2005, Communications segment EBITDA improved by 4.6% and its EBITDA margin improved by 0.6 percentage points, when compared to the same period in 2004, as discussed in Section 5.4 Communications segment results. For these reasons, and due to lower amortization of intangible assets, consolidated operating income increased significantly by $89 million and $232 million, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004.
Net income and earnings per share also increased significantly in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared to the same periods in 2004 due to improved Operating income. Net interest expenses increased in the second quarter and first six months 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004, due to a $17.5 million accrual for estimated damages for a lawsuit (see Risks and uncertainties - Section 10.5 Litigation), and otherwise decreased as a result of debt repayments in 2004.The favourable impact of the change in tax estimates, other tax adjustments and related interest were minimal in the second quarter of 2005 (approximately 15 cents per share in the first six months of 2005). In comparison, favourable tax settlements increased earnings per share by approximately 13 cents per share and 17 cents per share, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2004.
The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to increased Operating income and changes in non-cash working capital. Despite higher consolidated EBITDA and cash interest received, free cash flow decreased in the second quarter of 2005 due to higher capital expenditures and lower cash tax recoveries, when compared with the same period in 2004. Free cash flow for the first six months of 2005 increased primarily due to growth in EBITDA, lower cash interest paid and lower payments under restructuring programs, partly offset by lower cash tax recoveries and higher capital expenditures.
2. Core business, vision and strategy
TELUS continues to be guided by its six long-standing strategic imperatives that serve as a guideline for the Company's actions. Some recent examples of TELUS' activities in support of these imperatives follow.
2.1 Partnering, acquiring and divesting to accelerate the implementation
of TELUS' strategy


The acquisition of Ambergris in February and May of 2005 for a cumulative ownership interest of 52.5%, combined with the acquisition of ADCOM, Inc. in November 2004, provided aggregate incremental revenues of more than $30 million and incremental EBITDA of less than $10 million for the first six months of 2005. Full-time equivalent employees of approximately 2,640 for these two companies were included in the Communications segment staff count at June 30, 2005.
3. Key performance drivers
To focus on the opportunities and challenges, and to create value for shareholders, TELUS sets corporate priorities each year. An update on certain priorities follows:
3.1 Enhancing Mobility's leadership position in wireless
TELUS Mobility leadership position in financial and operational performance was evidenced by the continued trend of significant profitable growth, which is fuelled by its commitment to exceptional client service and value-added approach, supported by its strong brand and superior network quality.
TELUS Mobility revenue growth of 18.7%, EBITDA growth of 31.8% and cash flow growth (EBITDA less capital expenditures) of 30.6% in the first half of 2005 continues to exceed expectations set at the beginning of the year. Strong wireless subscriber growth of 211,300 in the first six months of 2005 (up by 11.3% over the same period in 2004), continued scale efficiencies and innovative value added offerings continue to drive these results.
3.2 Leveraging investments in high-speed Internet technology through
Future Friendly Home services in B.C., Alberta and Eastern Quebec


The trial of TELUS TV(R) services by employees continues in larger centres in TELUS' Western incumbent region. The Company continues to evaluate if and when to launch video entertainment services, considering four principal factors for the service: (i) a positive return on investment, which leverages past investments in high speed Internet; (ii) non-price differentiating service attributes; (iii) technical soundness of technology; and (iv) a positive service delivery experience. In July 2005, the Canadian Radio- television and Telecommunications Commission ("CRTC") approved TELUS' application for a broadcasting distribution undertaking licence to service parts of Eastern Quebec. This licence provides a new market for TELUS TV services, should TELUS decide to launch in the future.
3.3 Accelerating wireline performance in Ontario and Quebec business
markets


The results for non-incumbent local exchange carrier ("non-ILEC") operations in Central Canada, which are part of TELUS' Communications segment, demonstrate that the Company is on track to exceed its original annual targets for non-ILEC revenue and EBITDA and achieve its current annual guidance of $625 to $650 million for non-ILEC revenue and $15 to $20 million for non-ILEC EBITDA. Non-ILEC revenue and EBITDA increased by $24.9 million and $17.3 million, respectively, in the second quarter of 2005, when compared with the same period in 2004. For the first half of 2005, non-incumbent operations experienced revenue and EBITDA growth of $56.0 million and $34.3 million, respectively, when compared with the first half of 2004. It is notable that non-incumbent EBITDA has now been positive for three consecutive quarters, continuing a long-term trend of non-ILEC EBITDA improvement.
3.4 Reaching a collective agreement
Reaching a collective agreement remains a priority for TELUS in 2005. Both the Company and the Telecommunications Workers Union ("TWU") have taken measures to increase pressure on each other to reach settlement. The current status of labour negotiations with the TWU is reflected by the escalation of these measures, culminating in TELUS' July 12, 2005 announcement of its intent to implement its comprehensive offer of settlement commencing on July 22, 2005 and the TWU's initiation of full strike activity on July 21. Also on July 21, the Canada Industrial Relations Board ("CIRB") rejected the TWU's unfair labour practice complaint that sought binding arbitration. In response to union strike activity, TELUS has implemented its contingency plans designed to minimize the impact on customers. On July 22, TELUS did commence implementation of its offer. The following is a summary of events during the second quarter and subsequently.
Following the CIRB's February 2, 2005 decision which overturned its January 2004 binding arbitration order, the parties resumed negotiations on February 10, 2005 with the assistance of a federally appointed mediator. The Company tabled a comprehensive offer to the TWU on April 13. The Company communicated the terms and conditions of that offer to bargaining unit team members on April 21. The Company further tabled an addendum to the offer with the TWU on June 14, which provided clarifications and adjustments to the April 13 offer, benefiting employees and extending the duration of the offer from three to five years. The contract proposals have never been presented by the TWU to its membership for a ratification vote.
On April 18, 2005, the Company declared negotiations to be at an impasse and delivered first notice of lockout to the TWU. That notice, effective April 25, which did not include the closing of operations, included a number of measures, such as the suspension of grievance and arbitration processes, joint Union management committees, scheduling of accumulated time off, payment for the first day of sickness absence and the deferral of wage progression increases and increases in vacation entitlements. Attempts by the TWU at the Federal Court of Appeal and the CIRB for interim relief against this notice were unsuccessful.
TELUS escalated lockout measures during May and June aimed at reaching a settlement, including stopping collection and remittance of union dues. In response, the TWU imposed an overtime and relieving management ban and announced a work-to-rule campaign. On June 22, the TWU tabled its counter proposal to TELUS. The Company reviewed the TWU proposal and rejected it on June 24 because it did not in any meaningful fashion directly address TELUS' need for improved productivity and flexibility. Moreover, the offer widened the gap between the parties with respect to some key aspects such as the contract duration and reduction of extra days off. The TWU also began rotating strike activity in early July, in the form of "study sessions", to which management usually responded by imposing three-hour or longer lockouts for those employees who participated in the strike activity.
On July 12, TELUS informed the TWU that, effective July 22, it would commence implementation of its comprehensive offer of settlement including both the April 13, 2005 offer and the June 14, 2005 addendum. The implementation will not include the past period and other lump sum payments totalling approximately $200 million contained in the TELUS offer, or certain pension and benefit proposals, which only become effective following ratification of the comprehensive offer of settlement. In addition, variable pay proposals for 2005 for B.C. based employees will only be earned for the full year period if the collective agreement is ratified by September 1, 2005. Given the escalation of job action by the union and its continuing refusal to place TELUS' comprehensive offer of settlement before its membership for ratification vote, management concluded that this significant step was necessary to ensure that the TWU and bargaining unit team members address TELUS' offer. In response, the TWU further escalated rotating strike activity by increasing the number of locations and employees involved and the duration of the "study sessions". On July 21, the TWU initiated full scale strike activity and the Company implemented its contingency plans designed to minimize impacts to customers.
The status of three matters that were outstanding before the courts and Canada Industrial Relations Board ("CIRB") in early May follows:
Appeal of CIRB Decisions 1088 and 278
The CIRB, in Decisions 1088 and 278, declared that TELUS Mobility's non- unionized team members, predominantly located in Ontario and Quebec, performing work similar to their unionized Mobility segment counterparts in Alberta and British Columbia, should be included in the TWU bargaining unit without a representational vote. TELUS Mobility's application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal was denied in June 2005. The impact of Decision 1088 and 278 for TELUS Mobility can not be determined until a settlement is reached with the TWU.
Application to the CIRB by the TWU alleging unfair labour practices
In early May 2005, the TWU filed an amendment to a previous complaint filed with the CIRB. It alleged the Company's communication of its comprehensive offer directly to bargaining unit team members was improper, and as remedy, the TWU requested that the CIRB impose binding arbitration to settle the collective agreement. The CIRB heard the amended complaint in late May 2005 and rejected the TWU request for remedy of binding arbitration, on July 21, 2005. The CIRB ruled that TELUS' lockout measures were in accordance with the Canada Labour Code, and that TELUS' communication of its offer to bargaining unit employees also did not contravene the Code. However, the CIRB did rule that TELUS did not provide information concerning employees of the former Clearnet early enough. Immediately following this ruling, the TWU filed four new complaints with the CIRB.
CIRB Decisions 1004 and 271
The CIRB issued a unanimous summary decision on February 2, 2005, overturning its previous ruling that imposed binding arbitration. In addition, the Board set aside the April 2004 broad communications ban, and re-instated its narrower January 2004 ban related to communications with bargaining unit team members on labour relations issues and negotiations. This ban lifted coincident with TELUS' first notice of intent to lockout on April 18. Subsequently, the TWU filed an application in the Federal Court of Appeal, heard on May 31 - June 1, 2005, and which sought to overturn the CIRB's reconsideration decision and restore the order that placed the parties in binding arbitration. On July 25, 2005, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the Telecommunications Workers Union appeal application, declined the request for an order returning the parties to binding arbitration, and in so doing, confirmed the Canada Industrial Relations Board's decision of February 2, 2005 that collective bargaining is the preferred method of achieving settlement.
4. Capability to deliver results

4.1 Operational capabilities - TELUS Communications


The Company is presently developing a new billing system in the Communications segment, which will include re-engineering processes for order entry, pre-qualification, service fulfillment and assurance, customer care, collections/credit, customer contract and information management. The expected benefits of this project include streamlined and standardized processes and the elimination over time of multiple legacy information systems. The Company plans to implement this project in phases, beginning with a launch for consumer mass market accounts in the first quarter of 2006. See Risks and uncertainties - Section 10.3 Process risks.
Recent regulatory decisions have introduced further constraints on TELUS' Communications segment operational capabilities. Telecom Decision CRTC 2005- 28, "Regulatory framework for voice communication services using Internet protocol", constrains TELUS' freedom and flexibility to compete for wireline and entertainment services in its incumbent territories, while competitors have been provided with forbearance for these services. Decision 2005-28 subjects TELUS and other incumbent local exchange carriers ("ILECs") to price regulation for their VoIP services in incumbent territories, while large facilities-based cable companies, foreign-based competitors who have not invested in Canadian telecommunications infrastructure, and others, are all unconstrained by regulation for the provision of VoIP-based services.
In addition to imposing price regulation on incumbent telecommunications companies' VoIP services, this decision also extended 'winback' restrictions to benefit competitive VoIP service providers by limiting TELUS Communications contact with consumers for one full year after they have been won-over by competitors. For business customers in incumbent territories, contact is restricted for three months. TELUS and other incumbent telecommunications companies have sought leave to appeal the regulation on winbacks with the Federal Court. See Risks and uncertainties - Section 10.2 Regulatory.
On the positive side, the CRTC has followed through with its promise to expedite approval of tariff filings and has largely cleared the backlog of outstanding regulatory issues affecting telecommunications. With faster approval of tariff applications, the Company is able to implement pricing and service changes in a timelier manner and avoid customer relations issues such as those created when tariff applications were approved many months after their effective dates with required retroactive application. However, an exception is the more than three-year delay for the CRTC to determine how to dispose of balances of revenue deferred under price cap regulation, which currently the subject of a proceeding (see Section 10.2 Regulatory).
4.2 Operational capabilities - TELUS Mobility
TELUS Mobility continues to execute its plan to grow profitably through the delivery of excellent customer care, value-added solutions, and superior network quality. As a result, TELUS Mobility believes it is well positioned to sustain an ARPU (average revenue per subscriber unit per month) premium in the face of new competitive pressures. Although the Company has been experiencing continued ARPU growth fueled in part by the adoption and acceptance of data offerings, the growth is expected to slow and moderate for the remainder of the year. Future profitability and cash flow growth are expected to be realized from continued subscriber growth and operating scale efficiencies through a well managed client focused organization.
4.3 Liquidity and capital resources
TELUS had more than $1.1 billion of cash at June 30, 2005. With access to undrawn credit facilities of $1.6 billion and expected cash provided by operating activities, the Company believes it has sufficient capability to fund its requirements in 2005 and refinancing requirements in 2006, which includes the June 2006 maturity of $1,578 million 7.5% TELUS Corporation Notes. The Company is considering the early redemption of all or a portion of these debentures in accordance with the terms of the indenture. As at June 30, 2005, the Company and its subsidiaries are in compliance with all of their debt covenants.
5. Results from operations

5.1 General


The Company's reportable segments, which reflect TELUS' organizational structure and are used to manage the business, are TELUS Communications (discussed in Section 5.4 Communications segment results) and TELUS Mobility (discussed in Section 5.5 Mobility segment results). The two segments are differentiated based on management, products and services, distribution channels, technology, and regulatory treatment. Intersegment sales are recorded at the exchange value. Segmented information may also be found in Note 17 of the interim consolidated financial statements.
5.2 Quarterly results summary

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
($ millions, except per
share amounts) 2005 Q2 2005 Q1 2004 Q4 2004 Q3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segmented revenue (external)
Communications segment 1,216.5 1,222.2 1,209.3 1,199.9
Mobility segment 802.0 752.5 755.6 747.0
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating revenues (consolidated) 2,018.5 1,974.7 1,964.9 1,946.9
Net income 189.5 242.2 135.6 156.6
Per weighted average Common
Share and Non-Voting Share
outstanding
- basic 0.53 0.67 0.38 0.44
- diluted 0.52 0.66 0.37 0.43
Dividends declared per Common
Share and Non-Voting Share
outstanding 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.15
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
($ millions, except per
share amounts) 2004 Q2 2004 Q1 2003 Q4 2003 Q3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segmented revenue (external)
Communications segment 1,189.0 1,171.1 1,182.4 1,186.3
Mobility segment 676.6 632.7 643.2 619.9
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Operating revenues (consolidated) 1,865.6 1,803.8 1,825.6 1,806.2
Net income 172.3 101.3 47.8 114.1
Per weighted average Common
Share and Non-Voting Share
outstanding
- basic 0.48 0.28 0.13 0.32
- diluted 0.48 0.28 0.13 0.32
Dividends declared per Common
Share and Non-Voting Share
outstanding 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


The trend in consolidated Operating revenues continues to reflect strong wireless growth at TELUS Mobility. Wireless growth resulted from increases in the subscriber base and ARPU. After taking into account that Communications segment revenues in the first quarter of 2005 included a non-recurring favourable regulatory adjustment of $6.4 million and seasonally high revenues from ADCOM (acquired in November 2004), Communications segment revenues increased slightly in the second quarter of 2005, when compared with first quarter of 2005. Communications segment revenues continue to show growth on a year-over-year basis in the second quarter of 2005 due to growing data revenues, flat long distance revenues, even considering the inclusion of a $10.2 million non-recurring favourable regulatory adjustment in the second quarter of 2004. Communications segment revenues also include the impacts of overall negative regulatory price cap decisions.
Net income and earnings per share continue to reflect the trends of growing EBITDA and Operating income, combined with generally decreasing net interest expense due to increasing cash balances and favourable tax adjustments, except for an accrual for estimated damages for a lawsuit in the current quarter, as described earlier.
5.3 Consolidated results from operations

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
($ millions except Quarters Six-month periods
EBITDA margin and ended June 30 ended June 30
employees) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating revenues 2,018.5 1,865.6 8.2 % 3,993.2 3,669.4 8.8 %

Operations expense 1,146.1 1,080.1 6.1 % 2,255.2 2,146.7 5.1 %
Restructuring and
workforce reduction
costs 7.4 0.7 n.m. 16.8 16.6 1.2 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
EBITDA(1) 865.0 784.8 10.2 % 1,721.2 1,506.1 14.3 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
EBITDA margin (%)(2) 42.9 42.1 0.8 pts 43.1 41.0 2.1 pts
Full time equivalent
employees, end of
period 27,789 24,521 13.3 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. See Section 11.1 Earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
(2) EBITDA margin is EBITDA divided by Operating revenues.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Consolidated Operating revenues increased significantly in second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004, driven by strong revenue growth at TELUS Mobility and good revenue growth in TELUS' Communications segment. Consolidated EBITDA and EBITDA margins also increased as operations expense growth at TELUS Mobility was contained to rates well below its revenue growth rates. Communications segment second quarter 2005 EBITDA was flat and its EBITDA margin lower, when compared with 2004, while for the first six months of 2005, Communications segment EBITDA and EBITDA margin improved when compared to the same period in 2004. TELUS full time equivalent employees, measured at June 30, 2005, increased due to two small acquisitions and the addition of a payroll services contract for the B.C. government, as well as to support subscriber growth at TELUS Mobility.
For further discussion by segment, see Section 5.4 Communications segment results and Section 5.5 Mobility segment results.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depreciation and Quarters Six-month periods
amortization ended June 30 ended June 30
($ millions) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depreciation 330.9 320.7 3.2 % 660.8 642.4 2.9 %
Amortization of
intangible assets 68.2 86.9 (21.5)% 140.5 175.6 (20.0)%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
399.1 407.6 (2.1)% 801.3 818.0 (2.0)%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Depreciation increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004, due primarily to growth in shorter life data and wireless network assets and a reduction in service lives for ADSL (high-speed Internet) equipment, partly offset lower depreciation arising from full amortization of cell sites. Amortization of intangible assets decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004, as a result of several software assets becoming fully depreciated.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quarters Six-month periods
Other expense, net ended June 30 ended June 30
($ millions) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 2.0 (75.0)% 2.0 3.2 (37.5)%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Other expense includes accounts receivable securitization expense, gains and losses on disposal of property, income (loss) or impairments in equity or portfolio investments, and charitable donations. An impairment in the value of portfolio investments was recorded in the second quarter of 2005, partly offset by recognition of a portion of gain deferred under sale and leaseback arrangements for administrative properties sold in 2002, following the return of some space to the respective landlords. The accounts receivable securitization expense in the second quarter and first six months of 2005 was not significantly changed from the prior year. See Section 7.6 Accounts receivable sale.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quarters Six-month periods
Financing costs ended June 30 ended June 30
($ millions) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest on long-
term debt, short-
term obligations
and other 178.5 167.5 6.6 % 337.5 332.9 1.4 %
Foreign exchange
losses (gains) 0.6 (0.1) n.m. 3.1 (0.7) n.m.
Interest income (10.9) (10.5) (3.8)% (34.0) (30.3) (12.2)%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
168.2 156.9 7.2 % 306.6 301.9 1.6 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Interest on long-term debt, short-term debt and other for the second quarter and first six months of 2005 included a $17.5 million accrual for estimated damages stemming from a recent Ontario Appeal Court ruling on a bond redemption matter dating back to 1997. See Risks and uncertainties - Section 10.5 Litigation. In addition, acceleration of financing costs associated with the redemption of convertible debentures in June 2005 added $0.9 million interest expense in the current period. Otherwise, interest on long-term and short-term debt decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2005 when compared with the same periods in 2004. The decrease was primarily due to the repayment of TCI Debentures and Medium-term Notes in the third quarter of 2004. TELUS maintains a hedging program using cross currency swaps, and as a result, long-term financing costs were generally unaffected by fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar. Debt (the sum of Long-term Debt, Current maturities and the deferred hedging liability), was $7,237.5 million at June 30, 2005, when compared with $7,580.9 million one year earlier.
Interest income earned includes interest for the settlement of various tax matters of $1.9 million and $17.5 million, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2005 (as compared to $8.3 million and $26.0 million, respectively, in the same periods of 2004). The balance of interest income, earned primarily from cash and temporary investments, was significant at $9.0 million and $16.5 million, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, increases of $6.8 million and $12.2 million, respectively, from the same periods in 2004.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes Quarters Six-month periods
($ in millions, ended June 30 ended June 30
except tax rates) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blended federal
and provincial
statutory income
tax 102.5 75.8 35.2 % 211.2 132.9 58.9 %
Changes in estimates
of available
temporary differences
in prior years - - - (36.0) - n.m.
Tax rate differential
on, and consequential
adjustments from, the
reassessment of prior
year tax issues - (34.2) 100.0 % (11.3) (35.8) 68.4 %
Large corporations
tax and other 3.5 3.3 6.1 % 12.4 10.4 19.2 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
106.0 44.9 136.1 % 176.3 107.5 64.0 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blended federal and
provincial statutory
tax rates (%) 34.5 34.7 (0.2) 34.5 34.7 (0.2)
pts pts
Effective tax rates
(%) 35.7 20.6 15.1 28.8 28.1 0.7
pts pts
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Blended federal and provincial statutory income tax increased due to growth in income before taxes of 36.1% and 59.6%, respectively, for the second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004. Reductions in tax included changes in estimates of available temporary differences in prior years and a tax rate differential (and consequential adjustments from) the favourable reassessment of prior year's tax issues.
Based on continuation of the rate of TELUS earnings, the Company expects to be able to fully utilize its non-capital losses before the end of 2006. The Company's assessment is that the risk of expiry of such non-capital losses is remote.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-controlling Quarters Six-month periods
interest ended June 30 ended June 30
($ millions) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.7 1.1 54.5 % 3.3 1.9 73.7 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Non-controlling interest represents minority shareholders' interests in several small subsidiaries. The increase in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, relative to the same periods in 2004, is primarily minority shareholders' interest in TELUS' February 2005 acquisition of Ambergris.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preference and Quarters Six-month periods
preferred dividends ended June 30 ended June 30
($ millions) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- 0.8 (100.0)% - 1.7 (100.0)%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Preference and preferred dividends ceased with the redemption of all of the publicly held TELUS Communications Inc. Preference and Preferred Shares, completed on August 3, 2004.
5.4 Communications segment results

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating revenues - Quarters Six-month periods
Communications segment ended June 30 ended June 30
($ millions) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Voice local 542.8 543.8 (0.2)% 1,095.6 1,072.7 2.1 %
Voice long distance 228.5 228.5 - % 454.9 458.1 (0.7)%
Data 379.8 345.7 9.9 % 757.4 685.5 10.5 %
Other 65.4 71.0 (7.9)% 130.8 143.8 (9.0)%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
External operating
revenue 1,216.5 1,189.0 2.3 % 2,438.7 2,360.1 3.3 %
Intersegment revenue 21.2 22.1 (4.1)% 43.8 47.1 (7.0)%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating
revenue 1,237.7 1,211.1 2.2 % 2,482.5 2,407.2 3.1 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------
Key operating indicators -
Communications segment
At June 30
(000s) 2005 2004 Change
----------------------------------------------
Residential network
access lines 2,993 3,053 (2.0)%
Business network
access lines 1,748 1,774 (1.5)%
-------- -------- -------
Total network access
lines(1) 4,741 4,827 (1.8)%

High-speed Internet
subscribers 729.0 624.3 16.8 %
Dial-up Internet
subscribers 260.5 300.7 (13.4)%
-------- -------- -------
Total Internet
subscribers(2) 989.5 925.0 7.0 %
---------------------------
Quarters ended Six-month periods
June 30 ended June 30
(000s) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change in residential
network access lines (40) (22) (81.8)% (54) (33) (63.6)%
Change in business
network access lines (12) 1 n.m. (13) (10) (30.0)%
-------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------
Change in total
network access lines (52) (21) (147.6)% (67) (43) (55.8)%

High-speed Internet
net additions 17.1 19.1 (10.5)% 39.3 62.7 (37.3)%
Dial-up Internet net
reductions (9.9) (8.4) (17.9)% (21.1) (19.1) (10.5)%
-------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------
Total Internet
subscriber net
additions 7.2 10.7 (32.7)% 18.2 43.6 (58.3)%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Network access lines are measured at the end of the reporting period
based on information in billing and other systems.
(2) Internet subscribers are measured at the end of the reporting period
based on Internet access counts from billing and other systems.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Communications segment revenues increased by $26.6 million and $75.3 million, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004, as a result of growth in enhanced and managed data services and new revenues from acquisitions. Also affecting revenue growth were two non-recurring regulatory adjustments: voice local revenues for the first six months of 2005 included a $6.4 million positive adjustment recorded in the first quarter, while voice local revenues in the second quarter of 2004 included a positive adjustment of $10.2 million.
- Voice local revenue decreased by $1.0 million in the second quarter
of 2005 and increased by $22.9 million for the first six months of
2005, when compared to the same periods in 2004. After normalizing
for a positive $10.2 million regulatory adjustment recognized in June
2004 (in respect of CRTC Decision 2004-42 pertaining to deferral
account recognition items), local revenue increased by $9.2 million
in the second quarter and $33.1 million for the first six months. The
increases were due primarily to 2005 regulatory adjustments and the
effect of business rate increases implemented mid-2004 and June 1,
2005, partly offset by the effect of continued line losses.
Regulatory adjustments in 2005 included the non-recurring positive
adjustment of $6.4 million for CRTC Decision 2005 4 (pertaining to
subsidy requirements for high cost areas in TELUS Quebec ILEC
territory for 2003 to 2005), recorded in the first quarter of 2005.
In addition, because TELUS used the liability method for recording
price cap deferrals, local revenue for the second quarter and first
six months of 2005 included favourable adjustments of approximately
$10 million and $28 million, respectively, drawn from the price cap
deferral account to offset mandated additional discounts for
competitive digital network services (basic data services) pursuant
to CRTC Decision 2005-6. See the discussion below for data revenues,
which contains the equal and offsetting negative revenue impact for
Decision 2005-6.

The 18,000 increase in residential line losses in the second quarter
of 2005, when compared with the second quarter of 2004, was due to
increased competition from resellers, VoIP competitors (including the
introduction of cable telephony in Calgary and Edmonton), and
technological substitution to wireless services. Business lines
decreased in the second quarter of 2005, due to the loss of a
business customer and removal of temporary lines following the B.C.
provincial election. It is expected that the trend of declining
residential network access lines in the future may worsen due to
increased competition facilitated by technology changes.

- Voice long distance revenues were unchanged in the second quarter of
2005 despite industry-wide trend of long distance erosion. For the
first six months of 2005, long distance revenue decreased at a lower
rate of 0.7%, when compared with the same period in 2004. Increased
minute volumes (including growth in non-incumbent volumes) and
increases in the monthly long distance administration fee in certain
long distance plans were offset by lower average per-minute prices.

- Communications segment data revenues increased by $34.1 million and
$71.9 million, respectively, in the second quarter and first six
months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004. This
included revenues from two recent acquisitions of more than
$10 million and $30 million, respectively, for the second quarter and
first six months of 2005. The increase in data revenues due to
acquisitions offset the additional discounts of approximately
$10 million and $28 million, respectively, for the second quarter and
first six months of 2005 for competitive digital network services
mandated by CRTC Decision 2005-6, as described under voice local
revenues above.

The remaining growth in data revenues not attributed to acquisitions
was primarily due to: (i) increased Internet and enhanced data
service revenues of $19.5 million and $47.5 million, respectively, as
a result of traction from new business contracts, and continued
growth in high-speed Internet subscribers and a higher average price;
(ii) increased managed data revenues for the provision of business
process outsourcing services provided to customers; (iii) increased
data equipment sales; partly offset by (iv) the additional discounts
for competitive digital network services in basic data services and
migration to enhanced data services.

The rate of growth in high-speed Internet subscribers has slowed, as
expected, from that observed in 2004 due to the high existing
household penetration rates for high-speed services in Western Canada
and lower gross additions caused by increased competitive activity.
In addition, the Company experienced high net additions in the first
quarter last year due to a very attractive introductory marketing
promotion.

- Other revenue decreased due mainly to lower voice equipment sales.

- Intersegment revenue represents services provided by the
Communications segment to the Mobility segment. These revenues are
eliminated upon consolidation together with the associated expense in
TELUS Mobility.


Total external operating revenue discussed above included non-ILEC revenues of $155.5 million and $315.0 million, respectively, for the second quarter and first six months of 2005. This represents increases of $24.9 million (19.1%) and $56.0 million (21.6%), respectively, when compared with the same periods in 2004. The increase was a result of growing revenues from the purchase of ADCOM, increased data equipment sales and as well as other data and voice service revenues, particularly from recently implemented contracts.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operations expense -
Communications segment Quarters Six-month periods
($ millions, except ended June 30 ended June 30
employees) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Salaries, benefits
and other employee-
related costs 422.5 414.5 1.9 % 836.6 807.5 3.6 %
Other operations
expenses 309.3 297.3 4.0 % 611.8 611.0 0.1 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operations
expense 731.8 711.8 2.8 % 1,448.4 1,418.5 2.1 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full-time equivalent
employees, end of
period 21,777 19,036 14.4 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Operations expenses increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004, due primarily to emergency operations planning costs in the second quarter of 2005, increased expenses caused by the addition of two operations in late 2004 (B.C. payroll services and the acquisition of ADCOM), and a new investment in Ambergris in February 2005. In aggregate, the three new operations added approximately 2,800 full-time equivalent employees at June 30, and increased total operations expenses by less than $20 million and $40 million, respectively, for the second quarter and first six months of 2005. Excluding employees from new operations, full-time equivalent staff at June 30, 2005 decreased slightly from one year earlier.
- Salaries, benefits and employee-related costs prior to acquisitions
and the B.C. payroll contract described above were flat in the second
quarter of 2005 and increased by less than 2% for the first six
months of 2005. The increase was due primarily to increased
compensation and increased full-time equivalent staff. Pension
expense for defined benefit and defined contribution plans was
$10.1 million and $22.1 million, respectively, in the second quarter
and first six months of 2005, representing decreases of $5.8 million
and $9.6 million, respectively, from the same periods in 2004.

- Other operations expenses prior to acquisitions and the B.C. payroll
contract increased by approximately 1% in the second quarter of 2005
due primarily to emergency operations planning costs. For the first
six months of 2005, other operations expense prior to acquisitions
and the B.C. payroll contract decreased by approximately 3%. Changes
to operations expense in second quarter and first six months of 2005
included: (i) reduced facilities, transit and termination costs of
$2.9 million and $13.2 million, respectively, due to the movement of
traffic on-net and to a lesser extent, price cap discounts from
competitor ILECs arising from CRTC Decision 2005-6; (ii) nominal
payments to Verizon under renegotiated Software and Related
Technology and Service Agreements, compared with $8.8 million and
$17.4 million, respectively, in the same periods in 2004; (iii)
reduced expenses for increased labour capitalization of $8.8 million
and $17.2 million resulting from a higher labour component in capital
expenditures in 2005; and (iv) lower bad debt expense of $2.2 million
and $6.1 million, respectively. These decreases were partly offset by
increased cost of goods sold associated with data equipment sales,
increased advertising and promotions and other general increases.


Included in the total segment expenses discussed above are non-ILEC operations expenses of $152.0 million and $292.7 million, respectively, in the second quarter and first six months of 2005. This represents increases of $7.6 million (5.3%) and $10.8 million (3.8%), respectively, when compared with the same periods in 2004. The increase in operations expense supported growth in non-ILEC revenues observed for the same periods.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Restructuring
and workforce
reduction costs - Quarters Six-month periods
Communications segment ended June 30 ended June 30
($ millions) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.4 0.7 n.m. 16.8 16.6 1.2 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


In the first half of 2005, the Company undertook a number of smaller initiatives within the ILEC portion of the Communications Segment, such as operational consolidation, rationalization and integrations. These initiatives are aimed to improve the Company's operating and capital productivity. Management currently expects that restructuring charges will not exceed $100 million for the full year of 2005.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
EBITDA and EBITDA
margin - Quarters Six-month periods
Communications ended June 30 ended June 30
segment 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
EBITDA ($ millions) 498.5 498.6 - % 1,017.3 972.1 4.6 %
EBITDA margin (%) 40.3 41.2 (0.9) 41.0 40.4 0.6
pts pts
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Despite increased competitive activity in the second quarter of 2005, Communications segment EBITDA was flat when compared with the same period in 2004, as increased emergency operations planning costs and higher restructuring charges were offset by revenue growth. Communications segment EBITDA and EBITDA margin improved in the first six months of 2005, when compared with the same period in 2004, due to the revenue growth exceeding the growth rate in operations expenses. Included in these results were non-ILEC EBITDA of $3.5 million and $11.4 million, respectively, for the second quarter and first six months of 2005, compared with EBITDA losses of $13.8 million and $22.9 million, respectively, in the same periods of 2004.
Communications segment capital expenditures are discussed in Section 7.2 Cash used by investing activities.
5.5 Mobility segment results

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating revenues - Quarters Six-month periods
Mobility segment ended June 30 ended June 30
($ millions) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Network revenue 743.4 625.5 18.8 % 1,438.9 1,217.9 18.1 %
Equipment revenue 58.6 51.1 14.7 % 115.6 91.4 26.5 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
External operating
revenue 802.0 676.6 18.5 % 1,554.5 1,309.3 18.7 %
Intersegment revenue 5.7 5.6 1.8 % 11.5 10.2 12.7 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating
revenue 807.7 682.2 18.4 % 1,566.0 1,319.5 18.7 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------
Key operating indicators
- Mobility segment
(000s) At June 30
2005 2004 Change
----------------------------------------------
Subscribers -
postpaid 3,419.0 2,980.1 14.7 %
Subscribers -
prepaid 728.7 633.7 15.0 %
-------- -------- -------
Subscribers -
total(1) 4,147.7 3,613.8 14.8 %

Digital POPs(2)
covered including
roaming/resale
(millions)(3) 30.2 29.7 1.7 %
---------------------------
Quarters Six-month periods
ended June 30 ended June 30
(000s) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscriber net
additions -
postpaid 103.9 103.6 0.3 % 178.7 168.3 6.2 %
Subscriber net
additions - prepaid 27.2 10.1 169.3 % 32.6 21.5 51.6 %
-------- -------- ------- -------- -------- -------
Subscriber net
additions - total 131.1 113.7 15.3 % 211.3 189.8 11.3 %

Churn, per month
(%)(4) 1.37 1.32 0.05 1.41 1.40 0.01
pts pts
COA(5) per gross
subscriber addition
($)(4) 342 381 (10.2)% 348 382 (8.9)%
ARPU ($)(4) 61 59 3.4 % 60 58 3.4 %
Average minutes of
use per subscriber
per month ("MOU") 405 390 3.8 % 388 376 3.2 %

EBITDA to network
revenue (%) 49.3 45.8 3.5 48.9 43.8 5.1
pts pts
Retention spend to
network revenue
(%)(4) 5.7 4.9 0.8 5.6 4.9 0.7
pts pts
EBITDA ($ millions) 366.5 286.2 28.1 % 703.9 534.0 31.8 %
EBITDA excluding COA
($ millions)(4) 468.6 383.2 22.3 % 895.8 719.3 24.5 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
pts - percentage points
(1) Subscribers are measured at the end of the reporting period based on
information from billing systems.
(2) POPs is an acronym for population. A POP refers to one person living
in a population area, which in whole or substantial part is included
in the coverage areas.
(3) At June 30, 2005, TELUS Mobility PCS digital population coverage
includes expanded coverage of approximately 7.5 million PCS POPs due
to roaming/resale agreements principally with Bell Mobility and
Aliant Telecom Wireless.
(4) See Section 11.3 Definition of key operating indicators. These are
industry measures useful in assessing operating performance of a
wireless company, but are not defined under accounting principles
generally accepted in Canada and the U.S.
(5) Cost of acquisition.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

- TELUS Mobility Network revenue increased by $117.9 million for the
second quarter of 2005 and $221.0 million for the first six months of
2005 as compared with the same periods last year. This growth was a
result of the continued expansion of the subscriber base combined
with increased average revenue per subscriber unit per month
("ARPU"). As a result of an overall increase in average minutes of
use per subscriber per month ("MOU"), continued pricing discipline,
and increased usage of data and Internet based products, including
picture and text messaging, ARPU increased by approximately $2 in the
second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the
same periods in 2004.

Average minutes of use per subscriber per month increased by 3.8% in
the second quarter and 3.2% in first six months of 2005, when
compared with the same periods in 2004. At June 30, 2005, postpaid
subscribers represented 82.4% of the total cumulative subscriber
base, remaining stable from one-year earlier, and contributing to the
significant ARPU premium TELUS Mobility enjoys over its competitors.
Despite the commercial launch by a new competitor in the prepaid
market, TELUS Mobility achieved significant growth in year over year
prepaid subscriber net additions. Consequently, total subscriber net
additions of 131,100 represented a record for all previously reported
second quarters for TELUS Mobility.

Blended postpaid and prepaid monthly churn rates remained favourable,
increasing slightly in the second quarter and first six months of
2005 as compared with the same periods last year due to continued
competitive pricing pressures. Deactivations were 167,500 and
340,500, respectively, for the second quarter and first six months of
2005, as compared with 140,800 and 295,000 for the same periods last
year. Notably, the monthly churn rate achieved during the second
quarter of 2005 improved over the first quarter of 2005 and the
fourth quarter of 2004, despite a slight increase year over year.
This is a significant achievement, in face of pressures from new
competition and from other aggressive Push To Talk offerings. The
excellent churn results reflect a continued focus on customer care
including successful loyalty and retention efforts, value-added
solutions and superior network quality for an exceptional service
experience.

- Equipment sales, rental and service revenue increased in the second
quarter and first six months of 2005 when compared to the
corresponding periods in 2004. Handset revenue increased mainly due
to subscriber growth brought about by a strong wireless market as
well as increased promotional, retention, and contracting activity.
Gross subscriber additions grew to 298,600 for the second quarter and
551,800 for the first six months of 2005 as compared with 254,500 and
484,800 for the same periods in 2004. Handset revenues associated
with gross subscriber activations are included in COA per gross
subscriber addition.

- Intersegment revenues represent services provided by the Mobility
segment to the Communications segment and are eliminated upon
consolidation along with the associated expense in TELUS
Communications.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operations expense -
Mobility segment Quarters Six-month periods
($ millions, except ended June 30 ended June 30
employees) 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment sales
expenses 109.7 99.2 10.6 % 214.2 188.4 13.7 %
Network operating
expenses 98.7 94.4 4.6 % 197.2 196.9 0.2 %
Marketing expenses 87.4 73.4 19.1 % 161.7 134.8 20.0 %
General and
administration
expenses 145.4 129.0 12.7 % 289.0 265.4 8.9 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operations
expense 441.2 396.0 11.4 % 862.1 785.5 9.8 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full-time equivalent
employees, end of
period 6,012 5,485 9.6 %
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


TELUS Mobility operations expense increased in the second quarter and first six months of 2005, when compared with the same periods in 2004, to support growth in the subscriber base. TELUS Mobility continued to achieve economies of scale as second quarter total operations expenses increased by only 11.4%, while the corresponding Network revenue growth was 18.8% and year- over-year subscriber growth was 14.8%.
- Expenses related to equipment sales increased in the second quarter
and first six months of 2005 when compared with the same periods in
2004, principally due to an increase in gross subscriber activations
as well as increased retention activity. Handset costs associated
with gross subscriber activations are included in COA per gross
subscriber addition.

- Network operating expenses increased by $4.3 million for the second
quarter of 2005, as compared with the same period last year.
Transmission and site-related expenses increased during the second
quarter of 2005 to support the greater number of cell sites, a larger
subscriber base, and improved network quality and coverage. The
digital population coverage grew to 30.2 million at June 30, 2005, as
a result of continued activation of digital roaming regions and
network expansion. The increases in 2005 Network operating expenses
were offset by other initiatives such as continued efforts to improve
roaming rates and reduced leased line costs through Microwave build,
as well as scale efficiencies and the competitive digital network
services discounts arising from CRTC Decision 2005-6.

- Marketing expenses increased primarily due to higher dealer
compensation costs and advertising expenses associated with the
expanded subscriber base and increased re-contracting activity.
However, COA per gross subscriber addition improved by 10.2% in the
second quarter to $342 as compared with the same period last year due
to higher gross subscriber additions and lower handset costs.
Similarly, COA per gross subscriber addition improved by 8.9% to $348
for the first six months of 2005, when compared with the same period
in 2004. With the higher ARPU, COA per gross subscriber addition over
the lifetime revenue of the subscriber improved in the second quarter
and first six months of 2005 as compared with the same periods in
2004.

- General and administration expenses increased by 12.7% in the second
quarter and 8.9% for the first six months of 2005, when compared to
the same periods in 2004. TELUS Mobility increased full-time
equivalent employees to support the significant growth in the
subscriber base and continued expansion of the client care team and
company-owned retail stores.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
EBITDA and EBITDA Quarters Six-month periods
margin - ended June 30 ended June 30
Mobility segment 2005 2004 Change 2005 2004 Change
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
EBITDA ($ millions) 366.5 286.2 28.1 % 703.9 534.0 31.8 %
EBITDA margin (%) 45.4 42.0 3.4 44.9 40.5 4.4
pts pts
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Improvement in TELUS Mobility EBITDA and EBITDA margin was attributed to its strategic focus on profitable subscriber growth, increased ARPU, a lower cost of acquisition per gross subscriber addition, excellent monthly churn rates, and successful cost containment efforts. The EBITDA margin, when calculated as a percentage of Network revenue, improved to a record 49.3% for the second quarter of 2005, and to 48.9% for the first six months of 2005. This compares with 45.8% and 43.8% for the same periods in 2004, representing positive increases of 3.5 and 5.1 percentage points, respectively.
Mobility segment capital expenditures are discussed in Section 7.2 Cash used by investing activities.
FIRST AND FINAL ADD TO FOLLOW
TELUS Corporation


CONTACT: Media Relations: Nick Culo, (780) 493-7236,[email protected]; Investor Relations: John Wheeler, (780) 493-7310,[email protected]

[ Back To TMCnet.com's Homepage ]