(Japan Economic Newswire Via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge)WASHINGTON, March 23_(Kyodo) _ (EDS: CLARIFYING 10TH, 11TH GRAFS)

Kansas-based Creekstone Farms Premium Beef LLC filed a lawsuit Thursday against the U.S. Department of Agriculture, seeking permission to voluntarily test all its cattle for mad cow disease in line with requests by Japanese and other customers.

The major U.S. producer, known for its high-quality Black Angus beef, said the USDA has even threatened with "criminal prosecution" if it performs the blanket tests for the brain-wasting illness, formally called bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE, while repeatedly refusing over two years to allow it.

The complaint was filed with the federal District Court for the District of Columbia. It is the first such lawsuit in the United States, thus rekindling debate here about BSE testing that may also affect the ongoing negotiations between the U.S. and Japanese governments toward Japan resuming imports of American beef.

The company has been lobbying for USDA permission since Japan imposed an import ban on U.S. beef in December 2003, when the United States discovered its first BSE case.

Creekstone Farms Chief Executive Officer and Founder John Stewart said his company has no intention of interfering with the negotiations and contesting the USDA's claims that such testing has "no scientific grounds," may send a "wrong signal" that all tested beef products are completely safe, and may also reduce consumers confidence that beef is free of BSE.

The company is taking the move to "satisfy customers" and their requests for testing, mainly in Japan, which is continuing to carry out blanket testing of all slaughtered cattle, to give them "an additional level of confidence," Stewart said, stressing that he is not talking about scientific facts on BSE tests.

Stewart said some other U.S. meatpackers support Creekstone Farms' move and are likely to soon follow suit to seek permission for the blanket testing.

Kansas Gov. Kathlene Sebelius has also expressed her backing of the company's voluntary attempt, Stewart said.

Taking the USDA's side, however, many large U.S. meatpackers remain opposed to blanket testing, which will cost them heavily as Japan was the largest importer of American beef before the import ban was imposed in 2003.

Steward said the cost for the testing, including procurement of test kits, is about $20 per head, or about 10 cents a pound (about 0.45 kilogram) in retail price.

In Tokyo, the Japanese government said it will closely watch developments of the lawsuit, but stressed that it has no intention of reviving its demand that the United States test all cattle for exports to Japan.

The USDA has refused to accept Tokyo's blanket-testing demand, thus eventually leading Japan to cave in and even to ease its domestic blanket-test requirements despite strong opposition, mainly among consumer groups.

Stewart said, "In a country where free enterprise, satisfying consumers, building businesses through thoughtful marketing and innovation are encouraged, I find it very difficult to understand why our government would not be supportive of this important effort."

In the filed complaint, the company said its "ability to continue to sell to Japan and other foreign markets, which constituted a major portion of Creekstone's customer base,....has been compromised by its inability to offer to test cattle from which it would supply those foreign markets."

Before Japan imposed the ban, Creekstone Farms exported about 30 percent of its products, and shipments to Japan accounted for 70 percent of the exports.

Under a compromise deal reached with the United States allowing no BSE testing, Japan lifted the two-year-old ban in December on condition that imports would be limited to meat from cattle aged up to 20 months with the brains, spinal cords and other specified BSE-risk materials removed prior to shipment.

But Japan reimposed the ban on U.S. beef only after a month on Jan. 20 because backbone material, prohibited under the agreed requirements, was discovered in a veal shipment at Narita airport.

In the process of lifting its original ban, the Japanese government eased its domestic requirements to exclude cattle aged up to 20 months from BSE testing to pave the way for resuming imports of U.S. and Canadian beef.

But local authorities are continuing the blanket testing of all slaughtered cattle in Japan.

The USDA tests a small percentage of the total cattle herd under a given statistical background. But samples are mostly submitted on a voluntary contract basis, and the department is now planning to scale down the surveillance system.

[ Back To TMCnet.com's Homepage ]

Discussions:


	Just like Paul Harvey, here is the rest of the story.... A so-called disease tracking program is the being perpetrated by big ag and the USDA using our tax dollars (100 million so far). Here is how it works... Corporate Ag, (factory farming) wants to sell beef and other meat on the global market. Fine, no problem with that. Foreign buyers, like Japan, want to be assured the meat is fresh, safe, free of disease, etc. No problem with that, either. But here is where the scam comes in. Big Ag has come up with a plan that makes it seem like they are checking the meat for diseases, such as mad cow and avian flu and other contaminants. But they don’t. In fact, the USDA has said beef processors, even if they want to, cannot test carcasses for mad cow disease because it will cost too much (!!!?!?!?) This program is called NAIS (national animal identification system) will force everyone who owns even one livestock animal on a private level, say as pets or for their own consumption, to register their premises with the government, microchip and file reports to the govt on every birth, death and off property move those animals make. If animal disease is suspected an entire 6 mile radius of animals can be depopulated (killed). Think I am kidding? I only wish I were. NAIS is a business plan for corporate agriculture, even though the USDA is pushing it as an animal disease tracking plan. But even Granny's hens, my horses and pet pot belly pigs in suburbia are included by having to tag and track and report all their births, deaths and off property movements. Why? So corporate ag can tell the world what a safe meat supply they have and Japan will buy that beef. But they only have one lot number per groups of animals, no chipping and few reporting events. Yup! Makes sure sense to me. Just like me having a disease but I force YOU to take and pay for the meds, then I travel the world declaring I am disease free. I am not against big ag making money, but the rest of us are forc

By susan barackman

9/7/2008 2:45:27 PM

+ Add to the Discussion

Receive more news in your Email

Featured White Papers