TMCnet News
Enterprise Private Wealth Reporting - Driving consistency, Scale and TrustMike Tropeano, CFA – Senior Vice President, Fi-Tek EDISON, N.J., Aug. 25, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Wealth managers continue to struggle to deliver reporting for internal and external purposes in a consistent and scalable manner. Data fragmentation, changing client expectations and most infrastructures are not optimized for reporting, are just some of the blockers to success. The longer we go without solving the root cause of the problem, the larger the impact on profitability through lost revenues and organizational inefficiency. Reporting is the face of your firm to your client either from direct delivery of information to clients or providing the necessary data to your internal teams to service relationships. The tools exist to break away from legacy processes. We need to adjust our mindset to focus on the desired outcome. This calls for an abandoning of the approach of 'we have always done it that way' and thinking more about addressing the real requirements of today's wealth clients. What is the problem we need to solve? Thinking about the challenges to achieving this, they are even clearer:
This result is a negative impact on your business. It starts with difficulty scaling, the need for increasing staffing needs to address the friction created and a higher cost of ownership. We can also encounter key person risk from a dependency on institutional knowledge. However, most importantly, a reduced confidence from inconsistency in reporting. The foundation for success Institutional data foundation where all data sources are clearly identifiable and the information reliable with little reconciliation. This also includes the delivery of information through a Data as a Service (DaaS) infrastructure. This can be done through an on-premises or cloud-based data warehouse. The key is a flexible data model. Structured data governance model to ensure reliability and trust in the results. This encompasses using technology to identify anomalies, identify deficiencies and track errors along with the processes to review changes to the data model, addition or subtraction of sources and the oversight to anticipate future changes. Dynamic design that can adapt to changes in technology and your business. We know change is constant. Re-architecting a solution within a few years of the initial deployment can be considered a low value activity and distract the organization. Your platform should have components that are considered technologically advanced, come from a provider with a strong strategy and a history of delivering innovative solutions. What are the options? The Analytics Centered Architecture: This type of solution will operate with tight integration to your operational processing infrastructure with a dependency on the data from those solutions. The objective is to move from reconciliation to reliability. A Layered Institutional Architecture: The main difference between this approach and a traditional architecture is the inclusion of reconciled data from other sources and the appropriate level of oversight to avoid different experiences for the consumers of the data. Where do we go from here?
Media contact:
SOURCE Fi-Tek
|
