TMCnet News
Disrupting Risk Scores: Dr. Jeffrey Edwards Sees Ratings as Early WarningsDr. Jeffrey Edwards joins host Karla Jo Helms on Disruption Interruption Podcast to discuss how banks are relying on an outdated two-factor risk tool that does not keep pace with today’s banking risk environment. His FFERM Technologies also considers predictability and compounding conditions to reveal how risk behaves before a crisis. TAMPA BAY, Fla., July 30, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- In less than two months in 2023, Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank all failed, creating a combined $548.5 billion problem. At Silicon Valley Bank alone, more than $40 billion in deposits left in one day; another $100 billion was expected to leave the next. The Federal Reserve later reported 31 unaddressed supervisory warnings were missed at the time of failure.
On this episode of Disruption Interruption, host Karla Jo Helms (KJ) speaks with Dr. Jeffrey Edwards, founder and Chief Risk Strategist of FFERM Technologies, about how likelihood-and-impact heat maps can reduce complex financial threats to static scores, and why institutions need to measure risk behavior instead. As Dr. Edwards puts it, "Math can guide you down the wrong path if you're looking at it the wrong way." Why Heat Maps Can Hide Emerging Threats Dr. Edwards traces the financial industry's standard likelihood-and-impact matrix to a 1984 U.S. Department of Defense framework used to assess weapons-system failures. The model ranks how likely an event is and how severe its impact may be, but it does not show when a threat is approaching or how separate exposures may interact. This limitation becomes most dangerous when risks are combined. Deposit concentration, interest-rate exposure, liquidity stress and declining public confidence can compound one another, turning several manageable exposures into a systemic failure. "If you have two isolated events and put them together, one and one sometimes does not mean two," Dr. Edwards says. "One and one sometimes means 13." Peer-reviewed academic research has also found that traditional risk matrices can obscure meaningful differences between threats. Heat maps can and should provide a quick view that prompts deeper analysis, not become the final answer. "You can't rely on them totally," he says. How Four Factors Reveal What Two Cannot FFERM Technologies assesses risk on likelihood and severity and adds predictability and compounding to the analysis. "The likelihood tells you that it may happen, but it doesn't tell you when," Dr. Edwards says. "Forecasting tells you more about when, because you loo at leading indicators." Compounding evaluates whether a risk remains isolated or begins spreading through the institution and amplifying other vulnerabilities. Together, the four factors can show if a threat is isolated or systemic, whether leading indicators make it foreseeable and how severe its effects could be, without reducing the entire analysis to one number. The methodology is designed to work with existing risk data and processes rather than requiring institutions to discard them. For Dr. Edwards, the purpose is not to claim that every failure can be timed perfectly. It is to give community banks, credit unions, and midmarket financial institutions a standardized way to explain what risk professionals may already recognize but cannot fully represent through a traditional two-factor matrix. "We saw it. We knew it. We didn't have the tool," Dr. Edwards says. "With these four factors, you turn the risk score into a risk behavior." Links Disrupting Black Swan Events: How We Could Have Seen It Coming, with Dr. Jeffrey Edwards Disruption Interruption is the podcast where you will hear from today's biggest Industry Disruptors. Learn what motivated them to bring about innovation and how they overcame opposition to adoption. LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/drjeffreyedwards About Disruption InterruptionTM About Dr. Jeffrey Edwards About Karla Jo Helms References
Media Inquiries:
SOURCE Disruption Interruption
|
