TMCnet News
New Schellman Research: 74% of Enterprises Say They Are Audit-Ready for AI, Only 27% Actually AreTAMPA, Fla., July 29, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Schellman, a leading global provider of attestation and compliance services, the first ANAB-accredited ISO 42001 certification body, and the first authorized AIUC-1 auditor, today released its State of AI Governance Report 2026, revealing a growing disconnect between how prepared organizations believe they are to govern AI and the maturity of the programs supporting that confidence. The survey of 525 U.S.-based professionals involved in evaluating, deploying, securing, or governing AI within their organizations found that while 90% of organizations have allocated funding for AI governance and 74% believe they could pass an AI compliance audit today, only 27% describe their governance programs as fully mature. The findings suggest that many organizations have built the foundations needed for AI governance but are still struggling to operationalize policies, oversight, and accountability at the pace AI adoption is accelerating. "Organizations are not struggling because they lack awareness of AI governance. Most already have policies, funding, and oversight mechanisms in place," said Danny Manimbo, Managing Principal and ISO & AI Practice Leader at Schellman. "The challenge is turning those individual activities into a mature, operationalized program that can withstand regulatory scrutiny and keep pace with rapidly evolving AI systems. As organizations deploy more autonomous AI capabilities, governance can no longer be treated as a one-time exercise. It has to become a continuous process of oversight, accountability, and validation." Key Findings from the State of AI Governance Report Confidence Outpaces Governance Maturity While nearly three-quarters of respondents said their organization could pass an AI compliance audit today, only:
The findings highlight a groing gap between governance activity and governance readiness. AI Agents Are Moving Into Production Agentic AI is rapidly moving beyond experimentation.
The report also found that approaches to human oversight vary considerably, with organizations taking different approaches to reviewing AI agent decisions and actions. Accountability Remains Concentrated The research found that responsibility for AI adoption and risk remains concentrated among a small number of executives.
At the same time, third-party AI risk remains a significant blind spot: just 36% of boards regularly discuss it, despite growing reliance on AI embedded within vendor platforms and enterprise software. Regulatory Pressure Continues to Grow Nearly all respondents operate in regions facing AI-related regulatory requirements. However, preparation remains uneven:
Awareness, in other words, is outpacing readiness: organizations know which regulations are emerging but are still building the infrastructure to meet them. Governance Delivers Measurable Business Benefits The report also found that organizations are benefiting from tangible value from governance investments.
As AI governance becomes increasingly visible in procurement processes, customer evaluations, and regulatory reviews, organizations are beginning to view governance as both a risk management function and a business differentiator. "The conversation around AI governance has fundamentally changed," said Avani Desai, CEO of Schellman. "Customers, regulators, boards, and business partners are no longer asking whether organizations are thinking about governance, they want proof that governance is working. The organizations that build trust through mature, demonstrable governance programs will be better positioned to scale AI, navigate regulatory change, and create long-term business value. Governance is increasingly becoming a competitive differentiator, not just a compliance requirement." The full State of AI Governance Report 2026 is available at Whitepaper | 2026 State of AI Governance Methodology About Schellman Media Contact
|

