TMCnet News

Incidence of Wireless Network Problems Dramatically Higher in Urban Areas Driven by Young, High-Usage Customers
[August 25, 2016]

Incidence of Wireless Network Problems Dramatically Higher in Urban Areas Driven by Young, High-Usage Customers


COSTA MESA, Calif., Aug. 25, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Wireless customers living in urban areas experience the highest number of overall network problems and have lower tolerance of those problems, according to the J.D. Power 2016 U.S. Wireless Network Quality Performance StudySM—Volume 2, released today. The finding underscores the importance of continued investment by carriers in urban areas as the use of 4G LTE compatible smartphones grows and customers expect faster data speeds.

J.D. Power corporate logo.

Now in its 14th year, the semiannual study is based on 10 problem areas of the customer experience: dropped calls; calls not connected; audio issues; failed/late voicemails; lost calls; text transmission failures; late text message notifications; Web/app connection errors; slow downloads/apps; and email connection errors. Network performance issues are measured as problems per 100 (PP100) connections, with a lower score reflecting fewer problems and higher overall performance.

According to the study, customers living in urban areas experience the highest number of overall network problems, at 15 PP100 vs. 12 PP100 among those living in rural areas and 10 PP100 among those living in suburban areas. The high level of problems in urban locales exists across all network problem areas. For example, customers living in urban areas experience more calling problems than those living in rural or suburban areas (19 PP100 vs. 13 PP100, respectively); messaging problems (8 PP100 vs. 5 PP100); and data problems (20 PP100 vs. 15 PP100).

Also contributing to the high incidence level is that urban areas have a much higher proportion of younger wireless subscribers. The overall number of network quality problems is 17 PP100 among customers 18-34 years old vs. 10 PP100 among those 35 years and older. Younger customers experience higher rates of problems because they are heavy users of their devices. For example, customers 18-34 received, on average, 39 text messages during the previous 48 hours vs. 14 text messages among those 35 years and older. Similarly, customers 18-34 connected to an app on their phone 15 times, on average, during the previous 48 hours vs. seven times among those 35 and older.

"Enhancing network performance to ensure customers consistently experience a high-quality connection—especially those living in urban areas—can substantially improve loyalty for wireless carriers," said Kirk Parsons, senior director and technology, media & telecom practice leader at J.D. Power. "This can be accomplished by improving bandwidth efficiency, data connection speeds and reliability. To retain customers, carriers need to proactively expand and upgrade networks to align with the latest generation of services and devices, particularly those that rely on data speed and consistent connections, such as broadband devices."

This holds true knowing that urban customers are especially likely to defect when they experience a high number of network problems. More than one-third (37%) of customers in urban areas who experience overall network problems at a higher incidence than 12 PP100 say they "definitely will" switch carriers in the next 12 months, compared with 17% among suburban customers and 21% among rural customers.

Following are some other key findings of the 2016 Vol. 2 Study:

  • Overall Wireless Network Quality Remains Steady: Overall wireless network quality problem incidence is 12 PP100, which is on par with the incidence measured six months ago in the 2016 Vol. 1 Study.
  • Data Quality Varies by Device: On average, wireless customers experience the highest number of data quality problems when using a mobile broadband device (30 PP100), followed by a tablet (19 PP100) and phone (11 PP100).
  • Incidence of 4G-Enabled Devices Increasing: More than eight in 10 (81%) smartphone owners indicate using a 4G-enabled device, compared with 59% just two years ago.
  • Customers Becoming Less Tolerant: Nearly one-fourth (24%) of customers who experienced overall network problems at an incidence of more than 12 PP100 say they "definitely will" switch carriers vs. 21% last volume.

Study Rankings 
Metropolitan service areas with the fewest network quality problems (8 PP100 each) are Charlotte, N.C.; Cincinnati, Ohio; St. Louis, Mo.; and Hartford, Conn. San Jose, Calif., has the highest number of reported network quality problems at 23 PP100.

Verizon Wireless ranks highest in five of the six regions, with typically lower PP100 scores than the regional averages in call quality, messaging quality and data quality. U.S. Cellular, absent from the study since 2014, ranks highest in the North Central region and excels in most network problem areas, especially call quality and data quality.

The 2016 U.S. Wireless Network Quality Performance Study—Volume 2 is based on responses from 43,300 wireless customers. Carrier performance is examined in six geographic regions: Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, Southeast, North Central, Southwest and West. In addition to evaluating the network quality experienced by customers with wireless phones, the study also measures the network performance of tablets and mobile broadband devices. The study was fielded January through June 2016.





Study Rankings


J.D. Power 2016 Wireless Network Quality Study—Volume 2


Northeast Region

Problems per 100 (PP100) Mobile Connections





Overall Index Scores 



JDPower.com Power Circle Ratings

Verizon Wireless 

10


5

Northeast Average 

13


3

Sprint 

15


2

T-Mobile 

16


2

AT&T 

17


2









Mid-Atlantic Region

Problems per 100 (PP100) Mobile Connections





Overall Index Scores 



JDPower.com Power Circle Ratings

Verizon Wireless 

8


5

Mid-Atlantic Average 

11


3

AT&T 

13


2

Sprint 

13


2

T-Mobile 

14


2





Southeast Region

Problems per 100 (PP100) Mobile Connections





Overall Index Scores  



JDPower.com Power Circle Ratings

Verizon Wireless

8


5

Southeast Average 

11


3

Sprint 

12


3

AT&T 

13


2

T-Mobile 

15


2




North Central Region

Problems per 100 (PP100) Mobile Connections





Overall Index Scores 



JDPower.com Power Circle Ratings

U.S. Cellular 

7


5

Verizon Wireless 

8


4

North Central Average 

10


3

Sprint 

11


3

AT&T 

12


2

T-Mobile 

13


2





Southwest Region

Problems per 100 (PP100) Mobile Connections





Overall Index Scores 



JDPower.com Power Circle Ratings

Verizon Wireless

9


5

Sprint 

11


4

Southwest Average 

12


3

AT&T 

13


3

T-Mobile 

15


2





West Region

Problems per 100 (PP100) Mobile Connections





Overall Index Scores 



JDPower.com Power Circle Ratings

Verizon Wireless 

10


5

Sprint

13


3

West Average

13


3

T-Mobile 

14


3

AT&T 

17


2





Power Circle Ratings Legend

5 – Among the best

4 – Better than most

3 – About average

2 – The rest


 

Award-Eligible Carriers Included in the Study

Company 

Business Leader 

U.S. Company Location

AT&T 

Glenn Lurie

Atlanta, Ga.

Sprint 

Marcelo Claure

Overland Park, Kan.

T-Mobile 

John Legere

Bellevue, Wash.

U.S. Cellular 

Kenneth R. Meyers

Chicago, Ill.

Verizon Wireless 

John Stratton

New York, N.Y.

 

Media Relations Contact 
Geno Effler; J.D. Power; Costa Mesa, Calif.; 714-621-6224; [email protected]

About J.D. Power and Advertising/Promotional Rules www.jdpower.com/about-us/press-release-info

Logo - http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20130605/LA26502LOGO

 

 

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/incidence-of-wireless-network-problems-dramatically-higher-in-urban-areas-driven-by-young-high-usage-customers-300317898.html

SOURCE J.D. Power


[ Back To TMCnet.com's Homepage ]