Incentivated Releases Mobile Business Test Survey
Jan 09, 2013 (Close-Up Media via COMTEX) --
Despite the rapid take-up of smartphone and tablet mobile devices, a surge in m-commerce and the introduction of 4G, FTSE-100 companies are not mobile-ready and as a result are wasting millions of pounds on internet advertising by sending consumers to sites that do not work as users expect them to, according to a release from Incentivated.
The study into UK mobile business performance reveals a chasm between consumer behaviour and Britain's top companies. Incentivated employed the kind of rigour that consumers do when voting with their thumbs, and the reason why leading US brands are dominating the digital landscape as it mobilises. UK and Europe no longer lead the way in mobile marketing. The Americans follow the dollars and people are buying through mobile.
Each FTSE-100 company website was analysed and scored for mobile readiness based on three objective criteria as well as two subjective ones: whether a mobile search is automatically detected and directed to a mobile site (or served a meaningful responsive design); whether the page size is small enough to load quickly on a 2.5G or 3G network (i.e. an element of server-side responsiveness or RESS to reduce payload); and whether the site is optimised to work across multiple mobile platforms such as Android, Windows and Blackberry rather than just iPhone alone. (Minor UX issues, like hiding the URL bar to release more space for content, have been ignored in this analysis.)
The subjective criteria included: whether the site contained useful content or was just a blog or similar short-form content such as a list of links to un-optimised desktop content, and whether there was branding in place. Mobile real estate is just as valuable as anything else and some businesses have shown that a small screen-size is no limit to creativity.
The tests revealed:
69 of FTSE 100 firms are not optimised for mobile at all
22 have had a go but scored badly
Only eight score moderately well but frankly are inadequate
Only one (M&S) stood out, scoring four out of five
Yet it's so easy to obtain a score of four or even five out of five. You have to look outside the FTSE-100, to publishers and smaller businesses (e.g. Gatwick Airport) or to American businesses to find scores of four to five. In comparison US brands, a handful of global brands get it all right; businesses such as Amazon, Ebay, Twitter, Remington etc. (That said, businesses like Samsung and Microsoft only score slightly better than average and Apple still refuses to play ball at all, but maybe you don't need to when people are falling over themselves to buy your product.)
Results included ARM (the designer of chips that power most mobile phones) and WPP (a marketing services business); both of which scored poorly.
Examples of failings by type Category Company Commentary What can you say - a No mobile site Legal and General missed opportunity. This retailer has been left behind by the entire sector and will be missing out on sales. Evidence is clear that Mobile site not accessible from consumers buy through or presented through the sites more than they do URL (i.e. difficult through apps (Next has a to find via search) Next good app). In CRH's case the home page is >4mb (could take several minutes to download on 3G and even Page file size too large CRH longer on GPRS). Technical issues prevent content working on most devices, including Technical issues Babcock iPhone. Looks like it was built Poor or no branding ARM ten years ago. Professional services firms rarely practise Poor or no content WPP what they preach. Clicking on most of the content links takes you to the (non mobilised) Veneer of mobilisation Aviva desktop site.
Localisation has not been tested, i.e. we have assumed the user is UK based even though many of these businesses have global reach.
Company focus: J Sainsbury's, BT and M&S
Recognising that it is less essential for corporate sites to be mobilised if their consumer and brand sites are mobile ready, the study examined three 'technically good' FTSE 100 companies in-depth: BT, J Sainsbury's, and Marks and Spencer.
This analysis found that only BT's corporate site is optimised but none of its consumer-facing phone or TV services is available in a mobile format, while its broadband users are dealt with minimally through one Wi-Fi hotspot finder. With price comparison sites mobilising BT has a chance to leave Virgin Media and Sky behind i.e. these comparison sites will direct traffic to a mobilised BT.
Marks and Spencer mobile site is fully optimised, scoring four out of five with the one scoring loss coming from the way the site has had to be built initially - a short-term constraint dictated by a pre-mobile website strategy. The current mobile solution does its best to work around these known issues.
Both J Sainsbury's corporate and consumer sites are optimised for small screen. However, while the latter fulfils all technical criteria, its branding and content are greatly lacking. Most of the desktop site's imagery has been stripped away and sections of the site are not optimised. In any other sector, for UK businesses, this would be considered 'OK' - but UK retailers have woken up to the ROI from mobile commerce and businesses like J Sainsbury and John Lewis have been left behind.
Best and worst mobile companies
The research found that M&S has the best mobile site in the FTSE100, while seven companies jointly hold the title for worst mobile sites (scoring 0/5) including Rolls Royce and International Airlines Group (parent of BA and Iberia).
According to the Standard Industry Codes the best performing category is Information and Communication, the worst is a three-way tie between Transportation, Admin and Water Supply, Sewerage, Waste Management and Remediation Activities.
Sector examples of mobilisation in action (not exhaustive) Sector Company Commentary
No re-direct, slow loading due to large Accommodation and Food Intercontinental file sizes and little Services Hotels content and branding. Almost no branding or content on the site, but technically capable. The energy Energy SSE sector lags others. Desktop site served to mobile devices, slow loading due to large file sizes though to give them credit their Financial Services Barclays app strategy is good. BSkyB are making real efforts to provide mobile access to their customer base, yet this is through apps restricted by access to specific devices that cause as much frustration as delight. Meanwhile they still Arts, Entertainment and serve their desktop Recreation BSkyB site to mobiles Almost no branding or content on the site, but technically Mining and Quarrying Tullow Oil capable. No re-direct, little branding and content but technically capable.
New mobile Manufacturing Imperial Tobacco site "coming soon". Slow loading due to large file sizes but Information and good content and Communications Vodafone reasonable branding. No re-direct, little branding and content but technically Pharmaceutical Shire capable. Negligible brand and content (just press releases and share price) - odd given who Professional WPP they are. Negligible brand and content (just new and Property Land Securities telephone numbers). One of the best sites; a few technical improvements required to make it work on more Retail M&S devices etc. Transportation None have n/a
There is also a mobile branding issue as Incentivated found 70 percent of companies that have attempted to mobilise use an almost unbranded, homogenised, 'stacked bricks' design. All FTSE companies have invested heavily in their brands in the real world and online, but almost all have ignored mobile. This completely erodes individual brand character or distinctiveness in the mobile environment.
Jonathan Bass, managing director of Incentivated, said: "It's a myth that 2013 will be a tipping point for mobile, British business is woefully unprepared compared with our American cousins. Lots of companies are dipping their toes into mobile, but very few getting properly wet. Too many businesses assume that mobile is an extension of their current online offering. It isn't, it requires a very different approach. They don't know what they don't know and nor do their digital agencies. And don't get me started on SMS; an incredibly powerful tool alongside a mobile site or to support the physical presence, logistics and customer services.
"Mobile is becoming more important than the desktop and the benefits are screamingly obvious. Companies with a mobile-optimised website generate more revenues and customer engagement. They stand-out from their competition right now as well. The lack of investment and inconsistencies among FTSE business should worry all boardrooms."
Some organisations have adopted an 'app-only-strategy', believing these to be the answer. In our experience, and based upon numerous examples, case studies and the like, an app is never 'the' answer - it is one element of a response.
The research was conducted by Incentivated. Full research documents available on request.
Incentivated is a mobile agency.
((Comments on this story may be sent to email@example.com))
[ Back To TMCnet.com's Homepage ]