
April 1999
Is CTI Ready For Wireless Infrastructure?
BY TONY ROUG
The information revolution rolls on and the data and telecom networks converge: it is
clear that the next-generation public network will be built on open, standards-based
solutions that enable a new class of integrated services. The wireless industry is no
different. Wireless data -- subject to the same basic forces as the enterprise and the
public network -- is enabled by an open architecture. And building today's wireless
solutions using existing computer telephony standards will help wireless take its place in
tomorrow's communication network.
THE CONVERGING NETWORKS
Today's enterprise IT organizations are focused on the converging data and telecom
networks, and the effects of this convergence will be profound. It will mean breaking the
final wall of the PBX and moving from a comparatively simply computer-telephone
integration model -- computers controlling the PBX through an open interface -- to
building the PBX on open computers for seamless integration between these two previously
disparate worlds. Of course, convergence of data and telecom is also a big topic in the
public network, and the public network backbone has already been changing to support
combined voice and data. These changes also have implications for the current wireless
switching architecture.
The availability of a new portion of the broadcast spectrum for wireless and the
dropping cost of wireless service have led to an immense build-out of wireless networks.
In this new landscape, there are three ways for wireless service providers to
differentiate themselves: branding, cost, and services. Two of these factors -- cost and
services -- are driving the wireless industry to look at the same open enabler the
enterprise organization enjoys when deploying enhanced service solutions like prepaid,
messaging, and single number.
As wireless equipment providers redesign their architecture to begin supporting
third-generation wireless standards, there are many goals, including convergence of the
air standards -- Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA), Global System for Mobile
Communications (GSM), and Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) -- and the enabling of
high-speed data over wireless. These issues will take some time to resolve. However,
building a next-generation wireless system on open standards gives wireless infrastructure
providers the flexibility to adapt as new standards evolve.
OPEN WIRELESS SYSTEMS
The wireless telecommunications industry has had a mixed history with open systems. An
open system has traditionally meant an open air interface. Wireless operators demanded
this level of openness, since it allowed providers to choose from a variety of mobile
phone vendors instead of being tied to their wireless network infrastructure equipment
vendor.
For wireless local loop (WLL) systems, however, there has not been as much pressure
from telecom operators. As a result, there are numerous WLL products with proprietary air
interfaces. The attempts of WLL equipment vendors to reach standardization have largely
failed because the resulting standard would require a logical union of many proposals.
Although they share a common architecture, wireless systems use a variety of radio
technologies -- such as GSM, CDMA, and IS-136 TDMA -- which are being vigorously debated
in global standards bodies. For instance, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU -
www.itu.org), in its IMT-2000 initiative, attempts to
define a worldwide wireless mobile standard that would come online in 2001.
WIRELESS ARCHITECTURE: AN OVERVIEW
The subscriber unit in a wireless system digitizes the subscriber's analog voice using one
of a variety of voice encoding algorithms. The subscriber unit for cellular, GSM, and
Personal Communications Service (PCS) networks is a mobile phone. For WLL, the subscriber
unit is a directional flat-box antenna bolted onto the side of the customer's dwelling and
connected to an indoor telephone jack.
The base transceiver station (BTS) -commonly referred to as base stations - contains
radio transmission and reception equipment and signal processing capabilities. It connects
to an antenna typically mounted high on a tower. The BTS broadcasts radio signals to all
the subscriber units within a geographic cell. BTSs are typically built on custom
hardware, which is evolving toward smaller and cheaper BTSs known as micro and pico cells.
The base station controller (BSC) controls the communication for a number of BTSs to
optimize network deployment. The interface between the BTS and BSC is T-1 or E-1, with
proprietary communication protocols. In some cases, such as North American CDMA or TDMA
mobile networks, the BSC functionality is incorporated within the mobile switching center
(MSC). Also, for some wireless systems, such as fixed WLL, the MSC is not required and the
BSC connects directly to the PSTN.
The MSC communicates with the BSC on the mobile user side and with the PSTN and other
MSCs on the network side, coordinating calls to and from the subscriber unit. An MSC
controls more than one BSC and typically covers a large geographical area. The MSC needs
to interface with external networks to transport signaling between network elements. Thus,
an MSC requires Signaling System 7 (SS7) capabilities to communicate with other switches
and with intelligent network elements. Initially based on PBXs, the MSCs were quickly
migrated to the equipment vendors' large circuit-switch platforms, which were originally
designed about 10 or 15 years ago.
The wireless intelligent network (WIN) provides the capabilities to support wireless
subscribers when they roam between base stations, and more importantly, when they roam out
of their home area. WIN functions were initially an integrated part of the MSC, but
service providers are forcing WIN functions to move to open computing platforms using
standard protocols like the ISO IS.41 and GSM mobile application part.
THE DRIVE FOR OPEN SOLUTIONS
Today's MSCs and BSCs are proprietary architectures built on custom hardware and closed
software. This model slows the implementation of new features and impedes convergence with
PSTN features, resulting in scale that is out of proportion with need.
Slow Implementation Of New Features: In the PSTN, the intelligent
network drives implementation of new features out of the switch. However, the WIN
architecture is defined, but it has been slow to gain momentum. Adding features to the MSC
and BSC is overly complex. As a result, new enhanced services in the network, like
wireless voice dialing and prepaid phone, are being implemented through platforms that do
not rely on WIN software on the MSC or BSC.
Difficult Convergence With PSTN: Since the proprietary wireless
infrastructure is deployed and managed separately from wireline networks, new features are
hard to implement. For example, something as simple in concept as having a single number
for both your wireless and PSTN phone is anything but simple to implement.
Out-Of-Proportion Scale: Today's MSCs, built on the assumption that
the wireless density would not significantly penetrate remote locations, were originally
designed as monolithic solutions. The BSC, in fact, is a recent addition designed to
cost-effectively service a remote area without running connections from the MSC to every
BTS.
CTI TO THE RESCUE?
Can the same technology that simultaneously drove down cost and increased functionality
cross over to solve the cost and functionality issues in the wireless public network? Can
computer telephony solutions implement the functions supported by the public network
MSC/BSC? Such solutions are already being deployed as a top to bottom enterprise PBXs
supporting both classic PBX phones and site-wireless capabilities. So, what additional
functions are needed to create today's MSC/BSC?
1. Connecting to the BTS: Signaling and voice data are not
standardized for legacy technology. Signaling is typically based on SS7 or ISDN. Voice
data is typically CDMA, GSM, or TDMA packets over the voice channel. CTI has been
providing standard SS7 and ISDN component solutions for a number of years.
2. Connecting to the PSTN: Voice connects through T-1, E-1, and DS3
facilities. Signaling is typically through standard SS7 integrated services user part
(ISUP) for mobile, or standard TR303, or V5.2 for WLL. All these capabilities are now
offered as standard CTI components.
3. Switching voice between the BTS and the PSTN: This requires
transcoding from the compressed format of the BTS -- CDMA, TDMA, or GSM -- to the standard
format of the public network. This transcoding function is now a standard part of
components delivered to support IP telephony. The same DSP coder algorithms apply to the
wireless networks.
4. Translating signaling between the BTS and the PSTN: The MSC and BSC
implement the call state of the wireless subscriber unit. The MSC consults the WIN for
account information and interworks with the PSTN signaling. This is capability is similar
to support in the PBX call model. The standard ECTF S.100 CT Server solution supports
extensible call control capabilities. Call models can leverage all the different signaling
functions provided by CT components from rob-bit , ISDN, SS7, and H.323.
5. Connecting to the WIN: Standard WIN capabilities are migrating out
of the MSC/BSC. This interface is now based on SS7. Leveraging standard SS7 components,
the call model can now use the standard WIN messages to talk with the Home Location
Register or Virtual Location Register.
Robust deployable solutions are also possible through new technologies like CompactPCI
and hot plug, so that these days it is hard to distinguish the difference between a
proprietary central office MSC and a standard CompactPCI CTI rack. With today's
technology, you can even walk up and pull out a card without powering down the entire
system. In addition, solutions are now delivering a comprehensive management architecture
based on a standard SNMP management information base. New solutions can either integrate
with legacy wireless management solutions or plug into standard SNMP or even Web-based
management.
NEXT-GENERATION WIRELESS SYSTEMS TODAY?
Open CTI should accelerate movement to next-generation wireless solutions. This certainly
happened with the leading wireless services like prepaid phone, which are implemented
using enhanced service platforms based on open CTI hardware. More significant is the
rapidly-evolving CT Server architecture based on the widely-accepted Enterprise Computer
Telephony Forum (ECTF - www.ectf.org) S.100 architecture. The major goal of the
architecture is to allow implementation of applications independent of the deployment. By
leveraging a standard ECTF S.100 architecture, a next-generation MSC or BSC could
transparently host the rich applications in the enterprise as solutions in the public
network.
Functions the MSC and BSC need to support for the future include:
High-speed data direct to the subscriber: Wireless needs to support
browsing the Internet from anywhere using a laptop or mobile phone, and at data speeds
equivalent to basic rate ISDN or better. This means the MSC/BSC must move to support
high-bandwidth data switching. For digital wireless, the voice path is already a data
stream. Unfortunately, the MSC and BSCs treat data as a separate service, routing data
traffic away from the MSC. CTI naturally integrates data and telephony into a unified
solution.
Direct connection to the public backbone data network: As the public
network moves to a pure data architecture, voice packets from the BTS can be transported
directly rather than converted into the 64K synchronous T-1/E-1 format of the public
network today. In fact, IP telephony clients like Microsoft NetMeeting already support the
native GSM format.
Integrated services: Subscribers want transparent services across the
wireline, wireless, and enterprise networks. They also want their services to move with
them as the roam from Chicago to New York or even London. The ECTF open CT Server
architecture engages the same expertise that is solving these problems for the worldwide
enterprise organization for use in the public network.
To be sure, there are still many issues to be solved to achieve the next-generation
wireless network - especially seamless services to roaming subscribers. By beginning with
an open ECTF S.100 solution, the wireless infrastructure manufacturer can separate the
applications development from the network deployment. Also, the service provider is able
to leverage components from both the public network and the enterprise industry.
BUILDING NEXT-GENERATION COMMUNICATIONS
Open architectures are essential in the fast-changing communications network. And to take
their place in tomorrow's communications network, wireless solutions should to look to the
value of the standard ECTF S.100 enterprise CT Server provides to basic public network
infrastructure like wireless MSCs and BSCs. Building the next-generation public network on
open solutions will enable a new class of integrated services that will drive the
information revolution forward.
Tony Roug is the director of Advanced Network Services for Dialogic Corporation.
Dialogic is a leader in the manufacture of open, high-performance, standards-based
telecommunications and computer telephony components. For more information, please contact
them at 973-993-3000, or visit their Web site at www.dialogic.com. |