Daily, I am bombarded with e-mail requests from companies desperate to learn how to
integrate e-commerce, CRM and contact center technology into a cohesive business strategy.
I try to answer these questions, but it is impossible to give each question the attention
it deserves. To make matters worse, many of the messages I receive contain requests for a
short list of companies with a particular specialty in integration for a certain company
size.
At the last CTI EXPO (which has
now become Communications Solutions Expo), CRM companies were in their glory.
Companies are in a frenzy to start serving their customers before they lose them forever
to competitors. When your competition is a Web click away and service is a key
differentiator, a lack of world-class service means you might as well begin posting the
"going out of business" sign.
I feel compassion for companies striving to put together a cohesive strategy to serve
their customers effectively. Technology changes rapidly and numerous acquisitions make
choosing products more difficult than ever.
In the November
1999 issue of this magazine, I discussed reverse auctions and how a company called
buyingedge.com was at the forefront of this technology. I further went on to mention that
the individuals who created this company, now called buyersedge.com, are from IMA, which
has been producing call center software since the early 1980s. To put this in perspective,
IMA's products were launched more than a decade before most other players in the CRM
market even existed. The problem with many companies that have been in existence this long
is that they are out of touch with technology, but IMA is still at the forefront, as
evidenced by their buyersedge.com affiliation. The length of related experience at IMA led
me to believe that it would be logical to address the multiple questions I receive through
a Q&A session with IMAs president, Al Subbloie. A transcript of this meeting of
the minds follows.
How does a call center that is just learning to become a contact center
become the heart of a companys e-commerce strategy?
Over the past three years, most companies have created separate organizations between
the call center and their e-commerce initiatives. The reason for this was the feeling that
e-commerce business requirements are very different than call center requirements,
requiring very different skills and technologies for e-commerce implementations. This
strategy has created another silo to integrate, increasing the challenge for the call
center and the Web center to integrate toward a complete contact center, and sometimes
confusing the actual customer with an inconsistent response.
The first thing a company must do is look at the problem differently. Instead of
viewing the contact center requirements from the inside, or sellers point of view,
the company must look at the problem from the buyers perspective. Customers
demands for products and services do not discriminate between channels, begging for
consistent treatment across all contact center channels, either voice or electronic.
Customers do not care very much about technology, but do care about quick and personalized
responses, no matter how they choose to demand service.
The e-commerce boom is forcing companies to implement both agent-assisted and automated
response technology, fully integrated between the call center and the e-center, resulting
in a complete contact center solution.
A burning question remains, however. Should it be the call center or the e-center that
takes the lead in this transformation? This will vary by company, but the call center has
the history and experience to provide world-class service in most organizations, while the
e-center today has the unique position of understanding the recent technological advances
available for electronic response, which is still in its infancy.
The right answer is to put these two organizations under the same roof.
What should you be aware of before you implement next-generation contact
center technology in your company?
Most important is the need to view the technology from the customers viewpoint,
as opposed to the companys. This is a common mistake made by most organizations, and
it usually results in an inconsistent experience for the customer, who should be the most
important constituent in the relationship between company and customer.
A second important element is an understanding of all the available technology for
response management from the voice channel to the electronic channels of e-mail and Web
interactions. Many of these technologies are new and changing faster than most companies
can keep pace with.
A third consideration is a sound strategy for integrating the inevitable patchwork of
unique but advanced technologies that support response management across the varying
channels. These technologies are offered by many different vendors, none of which support
an integrated offering.
How can a company integrate the many disparate databases and types of
contact methods into a seamless CRM/eCRM strategy?
It is postulated by the analyst community that a complete voice-to-Web contact center
offering will not be available from a single vendor for several years.
This belief is causing many companies to implement point solutions for immediate
challenges in the contact center, such as e-mail and Web response, without an organized
strategy for integrating the contact center. This undoubtedly results in a patchwork
approach that is difficult to maintain and may not reach acceptable response levels for
the customer across channels. The costs are also very high for integration and total cost
of ownership of a complete contact center solution given the custom integration approach
of what could be as many as 10 different vendor points.
There is a more intelligent way to solve this problem. A few vendors, such as IMA, are
getting very creative by coming to market faster with a foundational technology strategy
that provides the fabric for integrating these multiple point solutions. This fabric is
called the customer management platform, which out of the box ties together the many
different vendor point solutions required in the contact center from voice to Web, and
also elegantly supports change. In the end, the integration of these technologies will be
even more important than the point solutions that make up the integrated solution. In
short, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
Without this fabric approach, a company must either hire or become a systems integrator
to perform this integration, and the need for constant change will be an ongoing
development effort over the life of the solution, resulting in a much greater total cost
of ownership.
How do call center outsourcers fit into the CRM equation?
Call center outsourcers have traditionally complemented an organizations CRM
strategy by providing highly productive relationship management for the call center
component of the companys total CRM approach. Over the past two years, the
outsourcing industry, primarily set up for voice channel support, experienced a general
slowdown in growth. This was primarily due to the overall increase in Web traffic, which
was at the expense of decreases in voice traffic.
More recently, some outsourcing firms have successfully reengineered themselves to
provide both voice and Web interaction management. These companies have seen a rebound in
growth due the successful implementation of electronic forms of response management. It is
clear that this industrys future success in the CRM equation will be based on the
successful integration of the electronic channels with the contact center. Given the
complexity of these electronic channel technologies, outsourcers can grow by offering
value-added services along with proven call center capabilities.
What do outsourcers need to do to make themselves ready for the future?
Outsourcers face many of the same challenges other companies face. The requirement to
provide the integrated contact center is real, and must be solved by the outsourcer to
enable world-class service to the customer. The advantage for the outsourcer in the short
term is that few corporations have solved this problem, leaving a window of opportunity
open for approximately 15 to 18 months for the outsourcer to offer a unique set of
capabilities to the typically slower-moving corporate community. Also, since the
outsourcer has the advantage of being the best at providing call center service, the
extension to electronic contact services should naturally be placed with the same
outsourcing firm.
The next 15 to 18 months will mark a resurgence of growth in the outsourcing industry,
but more importantly, there will be a separation of winners and losers in this industry
based on these players success or failure in adopting integrated contact center
technology and philosophies supporting e-commerce.
What is the most promising new technology that will affect our ability to
forge successful customer relationships?
Key technologies are those that support electronic response management, such as e-mail
response, Web chat, voice over IP, personalization, self-service and channel management.
However, rather than focus on any of these individual eCRM application offerings, many of
which are relatively new, it may be more appropriate to focus on the concept of component
OO technology and Java. The reason for this is based on the looming problem created by
these point solutions. While each is solving a specific business problem in total, these
eCRM offerings are creating a much bigger long-term business problem: integrating
consistently and easily to treat customers equally and according to their expectations
across all channels. As a result, the only way to proceed with more than 8 to 10 offerings
from as many vendors is to create standards, or underlying fabrics, off-the-shelf to
support the integrated approach. Only a true component approach can work given the
complexity of weaving this fabric from multiple threads. The result must be
interchangeable and scalable at the same time.
The bar has gone up for the vendor community to provide and adhere to standards and
component designs to accommodate this complex dynamic.
My thanks to Al Subbloie for helping me with this column. If you have any questions or
suggestions, please feel free to address them to Al at [email protected] and myself at rtehrani@tmcnet.com.
Sincerely,
Rich Tehrani
Group Publisher
rtehrani@tmcnet.com
|